Gaming0 min ago
What is good taste?
32 Answers
Not examples but a definition
And where does the idea come from?
And where does the idea come from?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by jake-the-peg. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Value attributed to signifiers that are in relative short supply that my acquisition of or access to, demonstrate that I am wealthy and cultured, whilst your are a miserable oik.
Our love of a class/caste/hierarchical society.
How can I demonstrate that not only am I wealthy, but I am so wealthy that I do not need to be directly involved in commerce. I have evolved from that level and now have the leisure time to study the Arts. Having studied the Arts I now have an appreciation of the esoteric, which you, you miserable oik do not have. I need to have tangible evidence of my and others credentials to fit into a certain class which ensures the exclusion of others.
Our love of a class/caste/hierarchical society.
How can I demonstrate that not only am I wealthy, but I am so wealthy that I do not need to be directly involved in commerce. I have evolved from that level and now have the leisure time to study the Arts. Having studied the Arts I now have an appreciation of the esoteric, which you, you miserable oik do not have. I need to have tangible evidence of my and others credentials to fit into a certain class which ensures the exclusion of others.
In defence of ruby, she's probably answered the bit about where it comes from. I'm sure the concept was invented by the Rich/Intellectual/Priveleged people to distinguish themselves from the hoi poloi.
'The choices we make and the things we can afford are superior to and set us apart from the vulgar proletariat'. It's probably an ancient greek or Roman concept.
'The choices we make and the things we can afford are superior to and set us apart from the vulgar proletariat'. It's probably an ancient greek or Roman concept.
It feels like a renaissance sort of idea, that an appreciation of certain arts or ideas made you as an individual somehow a better person
Does it really I wonder? Is an appreciation of Virgil make you a better person than an appreciation of car mechanics?
I think it's fairly clear that there's no direct corrolation between money and taste.
In fact terms like "Nouveau riche" imply almost a negative corrolation.
Is it possible that it'sjust an idea that was seized upon by old money to distinguish themselves from new?
Does it really I wonder? Is an appreciation of Virgil make you a better person than an appreciation of car mechanics?
I think it's fairly clear that there's no direct corrolation between money and taste.
In fact terms like "Nouveau riche" imply almost a negative corrolation.
Is it possible that it'sjust an idea that was seized upon by old money to distinguish themselves from new?
Good taste may be difficult to define, but it stifles creativity and is the enemy of comedy.
A person of little means may think their good taste includes an appreciation of the arts and opera, a person of generous wealth may find Westlife and the Beano floats their boat. It is a subjective approach and good taste is measured on their individual aspirations, pleasure and satisfaction. One person�s good taste is another�s crime against the senses.
In respect of comedy, Fr Bill probably has it about right, since in this context it is about general and combined levels of acceptability, pleasure and (dis)satisfaction.
Bad taste creates many more millionaires than good taste.
A person of little means may think their good taste includes an appreciation of the arts and opera, a person of generous wealth may find Westlife and the Beano floats their boat. It is a subjective approach and good taste is measured on their individual aspirations, pleasure and satisfaction. One person�s good taste is another�s crime against the senses.
In respect of comedy, Fr Bill probably has it about right, since in this context it is about general and combined levels of acceptability, pleasure and (dis)satisfaction.
Bad taste creates many more millionaires than good taste.
I believe good taste is entirely subjective, as it is a concept that is socially constructed (my opinion), rather than being an objective reality that is an innate quality some people have and some don't. Therefore, what is deemed tasteful or not will be located in a context which will change over time, within cultures, class or any other kind of social grouping. Any form of grouping or classification will have the outcome of helping people have a sense of shared understanding and belonging, as well as a means to exclude and differentiate from others. So the 'in' people will appreciate good taste, the 'out' people will not.
No, the �in� people are just arrogant enough to assume that they possess good taste. The �out� people are just not following cyclical trends like sheep. As I said, good taste stifles creativity since the �in� people will just go on believing in their idols and their own pre-destined self importance without any regard for individuality or personal imagination.
So if taste is entirely subjective why is beauty and proportion so universal?
Most of us can tell when colours clash, there have been studies showing babies prefer symmetry in human faces and I know of no cultures that venerate rubbish tips over mountain forrests?
Surely there's at least a cross-over between good taste and asthetic appeal?
Most of us can tell when colours clash, there have been studies showing babies prefer symmetry in human faces and I know of no cultures that venerate rubbish tips over mountain forrests?
Surely there's at least a cross-over between good taste and asthetic appeal?
Possibly jake, but then so could sound. Not many people consider thrash metal to be in good taste, but there are some who do ....etcetera ad infinitum. Discordiant tunes hurt the ears and make your brain hurt, but some people love expressive jazz where each "artist" plays a completely different tune all at the same time. Good taste, not on my nelly.
If a colour clashes, according to Trinny & Suzannah last week this is fine if you want to make an impact and a statement. This week however they say it is tasteless and vile.
Good taste, bad taste and no taste at all is the personal processes and organisation of ones own taset preference. Hegenism is a good word, but it is more about self-righteousness. All Americans have that doctrine, and we all know they have REALLY bad taste!
If a colour clashes, according to Trinny & Suzannah last week this is fine if you want to make an impact and a statement. This week however they say it is tasteless and vile.
Good taste, bad taste and no taste at all is the personal processes and organisation of ones own taset preference. Hegenism is a good word, but it is more about self-righteousness. All Americans have that doctrine, and we all know they have REALLY bad taste!
Good taste is a nude posed artfully with a feather, bad taste is a nude posed with the whole chicken.
Joking aside, Taste I believe was once much more closely linked with class and breeding. These days those lines have become mmuch more blurred as there are por people with immaculate taste and very wealthy people who demonstate poor taste - you need only look at WAG's weddings in Hello/OK magazine. Even breeding is no longer an indicator as you need only look at Lady Isabella Hervey/Tara Palmer Tompkinson etc so I think now that taste like art is in the eye of the beholder.
Joking aside, Taste I believe was once much more closely linked with class and breeding. These days those lines have become mmuch more blurred as there are por people with immaculate taste and very wealthy people who demonstate poor taste - you need only look at WAG's weddings in Hello/OK magazine. Even breeding is no longer an indicator as you need only look at Lady Isabella Hervey/Tara Palmer Tompkinson etc so I think now that taste like art is in the eye of the beholder.
Good taste tends to lead to a crushingly boring sex life.
I don't think you can define it but it comes from within and is less to do with your red wine preference, whether the brown goes with the blue and any other cliche I can think of.
To me it's about knowing how to appreciate something for what it is without having to validate to all and sundry why you like it. However you should be able to define why you don't.
I don't think you can define it but it comes from within and is less to do with your red wine preference, whether the brown goes with the blue and any other cliche I can think of.
To me it's about knowing how to appreciate something for what it is without having to validate to all and sundry why you like it. However you should be able to define why you don't.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|