Crosswords4 mins ago
Katie Hopkins
25 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Theland. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Shocking hag saying her usual shocking hag things, trying to make the Falklands somehow in competition with being in mourning over what happened at Grenfell. The two things are entirely separate, yet she still tries her hardest to stir up misery and discontent as she slithers ever lower amongst the already pretty low mouthpieces for her unpleasant and muddled views.
kvalidir
Do you really think that the Grenfell victims are the moral equivalents of those service men and women who died defending UK sovereign soil from illegal Argentinian invading forces? Really?
The victims of the Grenfell fire were desperately unfortunate. It also has to be said that many of them were illegal immigrants/economic migrants who had illegitimately rented flats from equally unscrupulous 'official' tenants, many of whom were themselves of questionable legal standing. Part of the reason the Government could not give an accurate estimate of the death toll immediately after the fire was because they didn't have a clue as to who was living there – and nor did Kensington and Chelsea council. Nevertheless, they ultimately lost their lives due to shockingly inept building regulations and highly dubious building inspections.
However, these people didn't die actively defending anything. They were the unfortunate victims of circumstance.
Katie Hopkins was trying to draw attention to the above facts. The men and women killed/injured in the Falklands conflict were/are heroes. The men and women killed at Grefell were victims. There is a difference. If you cannot see that difference, you're a fool.
And for pointing out this demonstrably true reality, you label her a “hag”. I wonder which one of us has the better grasp of reality?
Do you really think that the Grenfell victims are the moral equivalents of those service men and women who died defending UK sovereign soil from illegal Argentinian invading forces? Really?
The victims of the Grenfell fire were desperately unfortunate. It also has to be said that many of them were illegal immigrants/economic migrants who had illegitimately rented flats from equally unscrupulous 'official' tenants, many of whom were themselves of questionable legal standing. Part of the reason the Government could not give an accurate estimate of the death toll immediately after the fire was because they didn't have a clue as to who was living there – and nor did Kensington and Chelsea council. Nevertheless, they ultimately lost their lives due to shockingly inept building regulations and highly dubious building inspections.
However, these people didn't die actively defending anything. They were the unfortunate victims of circumstance.
Katie Hopkins was trying to draw attention to the above facts. The men and women killed/injured in the Falklands conflict were/are heroes. The men and women killed at Grefell were victims. There is a difference. If you cannot see that difference, you're a fool.
And for pointing out this demonstrably true reality, you label her a “hag”. I wonder which one of us has the better grasp of reality?
Latest Posts
Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles31 mins ago
Connections 322 - Sunday 28 April
Quizzes & Puzzles128 mins ago
ChatterBank151 mins ago
