Donate SIGN UP

Answers

21 to 29 of 29rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Zacs-Master. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
People criticising this because it's Microsoft are surely ignoring the biggest benefit yet. Now if something goes wrong, all we have to do is turn the body off and then back on again.
yeah why not - cure within 10y

the fact so far they have always been wrong is neither here nor there
Question Author
'They have always been wrong'

First time Microsoft (or any large commercial organisation that I know of) have taken this approach.
Question Author
Jim - the article I referenced was Jan 2015 which is fairly recent.
Yes, I saw the source after I'd first posted. At a first glance, it appears that my argument is close to that presented in the article -- that is, you can never entirely deal with the underlying risk factor (so that some poor *** will just get cnacer through awful luck), but that isn't an argument for not trying to improve lifestyle conditions and reduce the risk.
From 'random' selection through reasoned deliberation, life has always been about 'beating the odds'.
It's rubbish.
wonder what the annual payment to Microsoft would be to keep you alive, default the payment and ya dead
The cure will I think come from natural remedies .The reason I think that is that those who had the disease centuries ago should have has the same chance of survival as the present day sufferers .Such a terrible thing to come into anyones life .Thoughts and prayers are always with those affected that I know .

21 to 29 of 29rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Cancer Cure Within 10 Years?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.