Donate SIGN UP

The Nature of Britain

Avatar Image
Aquagility | 12:40 Thu 11th Oct 2007 | Film, Media & TV
4 Answers

How many viewers agree with me that this was a shameful waste of magnificant photography? We were not told the location of many of the shots and the script sounded like a primary school afternoon in the countryside. Not helped by Alan Titchmarsh's wooden presentation.

Am I alone in hoping that something can be done to lift the remainder of the series? Or is it already in the can?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Aquagility. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
-- answer removed --
Question Author

Thank goodness. But why on earth Titchmarsh? This needs an Attenbrough.
Brilliant photography and beautiful land/seascapes, but I learnt nothing from the programme. The mantra seemed to be, unique wildlife due to our unique geography! Well knock me down with a feather.

I do hope that the commentary begins to speak to us as adults in the following episodes; or does the BBC think that only schoolchildren will benefit from learning about native flora & fauna? Either that or TV is going the way of the cinema, where special effects replace plot to wheel them in.

OOps I've just had a 'Points of View' moment ....and I live nowhere near Tunbridge Wells.
Perhaps they should have used Griff Rhys Jones...his series was brilliant.

I'm certain that it's already in the can and will have been for ages.

1 to 4 of 4rss feed

Do you know the answer?

The Nature of Britain

Answer Question >>