Donate SIGN UP

In Defining 'Islamophobia'...

Avatar Image
Khandro | 11:55 Mon 04th Mar 2024 | Religion & Spirituality
118 Answers

 ... shouldn't we be very careful ?

https://email.t-online.de/em#f=INBOX&;m=15679552006322910&method=showReadmail

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 118rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Avatar Image
No one needs any hate specific laws. The whole concept is ridiculous. We don't have thought police, so everyone is free to hate if they so wish. Meanwhile it is actions that need to be legislated for, or against. And the victim of some action should not be treated better or worse than another victim, neither should their assailant, simply because of why someone...
00:42 Tue 05th Mar 2024

Not a useful link. Can't read German anyway.

 

I'll try copy & paste.

No, that didn't help.

-- answer removed --

Khandro, I've removed your post because it revealed your identity.  Copying and pasting whatever you want from that publication would be wiser.  

Question Author

Thank you naomi, I cringed when I realized my mistake.

Here's a link to a related article in today' D.T. which should work;

https://archive.is/RBLl3

I think itwould be a terrble blunder to lay down a hard and fast definitition and play into the hand of the likes of The Muslim Brotherhood. 

n. For once I'm in agreement with R.D. !

Having had it translated into English, i can find no mention of Islamophobia?

And nothing but eternal buffering from your 2nd link.

Question Author

It seems I've made a dog's breakfast of this posting. I'll just cut and paste an extract from the report, just in case anyone's interested,

'The Free Speech Union has published an essay by Tim Dieppe, with a Foreword by Richard Dawkins, arguing that any attempt to define ‘Islamophobia’ will have a chilling effect on free speech.

Tim Dieppe, the Head of Public Policy at Christian Concern, believes that any attempt to define ‘Islamophobia’ and punish those responsible for it, whether by cancelling them or changing the law to make ‘Islamophobia’ a ‘hate crime’, would have a chilling effect on free speech. That’s particularly true of the All Party Parliamentary Group (APPG) on British Muslims' definition, which is so broad that, among other things, it means anyone disputing Hamas’s description of Israel’s military operation in Gaza as a ‘genocide’ is guilty of ‘Islamophobia’. As the GB News reporter Tom Harwood recently pointed out, this would make Keir Starmer, who doesn’t accept that what’s happening in Gaza is a ‘genocide’, an ‘Islamophobe’. Yet the Labour Party, along with the Liberal Democrats, the SNP, the Scottish Conservatives, Plaid Cymru and the Scottish Greens, has accepted the APPG’s definition of ‘Islamophobia’.

That isn’t the only shortcoming of the APPG’s definition. It produced a report in 2018, fleshing out its definition, in which it claimed that ‘Islamophobia’ also includes “claims of Muslims spreading Islam by the sword or subjugating minority groups under their rule”. As the historian Tom Holland said at the time, “most Muslims, for most of history, would have been fine with these claims”. He continued:

The definition of Islam we are being given is of a liberalised, westernised Islam – but Islamic civilisation is not to be defined solely by liberal, Western standards. Military conquest and the subjugation of minority groups have absolutely been features of Islamic imperialism.

We risk the ludicrous situation of being able to write without fear of prosecution about the Christian tradition of crusading or antisemitism, but not the Islamic tradition of jihad or the jizya.

In effect, if we were to accept the APPG’s definition of ‘Islamophobia’ and do our best to eradicate it we’d have to shut down every Islamic Studies department in Britain’s universities. It’s transparently absurd, yet when the Muslim Council of Britain recently called for an investigation of ‘Structural Islamophobia’ in the Conservative Party it had in mind this definition, which includes anyone saying anything that could conceivably fuel hostility towards Muslims, regardless of whether it’s true.'

My point is that we don't have definition of anti-Semitism or anti-Christianity etc. so why do we need one for 'Islamophobia' ?

Ah ! So that's who Khan really is !

"Islamist" or "Islabophobia" ?

 

My ' off the top of my head' definitions of them follow below:

 

The first is someone determined to force Islam beliefs, usually an extreme interpretation of them, on everyone else with total disregard of needing to act in a socially accepted manner and to maintain decent behavior.

 

The second is an unjustified,  irrational, fear of Islam.

Using the prefix "anti" is very different to using the suffix "phobia".

> My point is that we don't have definition of anti-Semitism or anti-Christianity etc. so why do we need one for 'Islamophobia' ?

We do have a definition of anti-Semitism, as well as Islamophobia and Christophobia.  Instead of me giving a definition, I'll just let you find them for yourself:

https://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aanti-semitism

https://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Aislamophobia

https://www.google.com/search?q=define%3Achristophobia

 

Question Author

Ellipsis , those are dictionary definitions, the motivation behind this move it to make applicable in Law.

 

You said:

> My point is that we don't have definition of anti-Semitism or anti-Christianity etc. so why do we need one for 'Islamophobia' ?

So I gave their definitions.  On the legal front, these are all under the umbrella of "hate crimes":

https://www.cps.gov.uk/crime-info/hate-crime

https://lawcom.gov.uk/project/hate-crime/

https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/racist-and-religious-hate-crime-prosecution-guidance

Question Author

Ellipsis, isn't that enough? Why do we need a law specifically aimed at enforcing 'Islamophobia' ?

 

'Hate crime' was initiated anyway by the Muslim Brotherhood and pampered to by the government to appease their whinging.

> Why do we need a law specifically aimed at enforcing 'Islamophobia'?

You don't, you need (and we have) a law around hate crime.

So for example in this document (https://www.cps.gov.uk/legal-guidance/racist-and-religious-hate-crime-prosecution-guidance) it says:

> The CPS uses definitions agreed with the National Police Chiefs' Council to identify racist or religious incidents/crimes and to monitor the decisions and outcomes:

> "Any incident/crime which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by hostility or prejudice based on a person's race or perceived race"
>or
> "Any incident/crime which is perceived by the victim or any other person to be motivated by a hostility or prejudice based on a person's religion or perceived religion."

And then to look at two definitions:

* Antisemitism: hostility to, prejudice towards, or discrimination against Jews.
* Islamaphobia: the fear of, hatred of, or prejudice against the religion of Islam or Muslims in general.

You can see how the relationships work between the legal definition of hate crime and the specific two examples above.

No one needs any hate specific laws. The whole concept is ridiculous. We don't have thought police, so everyone is free to hate if they so wish. Meanwhile it is actions that need to be legislated for, or against. And the victim of some action should not be treated better or worse than another victim, neither should their assailant, simply because of why someone thinks the offence occurred. It is time common sense returned to society.

Khandro, //n. For once I'm in agreement with R.D. !//

 

In what way?

"......The definition of Islam we are being given is of a liberalised, westernised Islam – but Islamic civilisation is not to be defined solely by liberal, Western standards." - surely that is an oxymoron.

TTT, I don't see how.  We are led to believe that Islam is more liberal than it is - and we mistakenly endow its adherents with western mindsets.

1 to 20 of 118rss feed

1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

In Defining 'Islamophobia'...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.