Quizzes & Puzzles29 mins ago
Listener 4218 - System Analysts by Stick Insect
45 Answers
I feel this is an extraordinary feat, especially constructing clues which are valid cryptic clues AND provide all of the thematic hints; the end result is a thing of beauty.
On the other hand, I doubt 16 clues (many of which are relatively easy) is going to be enough to satisfy the Listener addicts.
I do cringe whenever I see the word 'line' (mis)used in the instructions; I realize Chambers supports the use of line=curve, but the mathematician in me knows a line is straight.
On the other hand, I doubt 16 clues (many of which are relatively easy) is going to be enough to satisfy the Listener addicts.
I do cringe whenever I see the word 'line' (mis)used in the instructions; I realize Chambers supports the use of line=curve, but the mathematician in me knows a line is straight.
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by TheBear69. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Yes, the dots represent the specific locations analysed in the system, with analyst 1's final path determined by the cells that show the theme. Although I've completed the lines I only have the one hint (TSM). Can someone please drop me a line as to how the other 3 (6) orientations are seen - thank you !
([email protected])
([email protected])
Like others I think the clue construction is a real tour de force. I managed to cold-solve them all, the last to yield being 7, which has a nice subtle twist to it. I've got the hints but am still puzzling over the final stage. References which seem to be relevant in Wikipedia don't really give me the thematic lines.
By luck my first attempt at entering the grid entries was the exact mirror image of the correct final grid, But then I did have to sort through (the first few letters of) the four wrong messages before I found the correct hint. It was bemusing as everything fell into place... Remarkable construction. Gold Cup contender?
-- answer removed --
I'd have felt better about nearly losing if I'd got all those gimmes in the first half - fancy not shouting out "genetics" or "Hobbes"! - but thankfully I got my act together when the pressure was on, eh? Thanks all and see you in the quarters - two matches guaranteed, that.
There's a funny story about that start on the sum "1+2+3+...+1000". It's simply the 1000th triangle number, or using the formula, 1000*1001/2. "Which is just... what? I can't seem to work that out! Argh!!!! Tell you what I know that 1+2+...+10 is 55, so I'll just buzz in, say 55, and shove a few zeros in somewhere...". True story of my thought process. Though by the time I opened my mouth I think the answer might suddenly have come to me.
There's a funny story about that start on the sum "1+2+3+...+1000". It's simply the 1000th triangle number, or using the formula, 1000*1001/2. "Which is just... what? I can't seem to work that out! Argh!!!! Tell you what I know that 1+2+...+10 is 55, so I'll just buzz in, say 55, and shove a few zeros in somewhere...". True story of my thought process. Though by the time I opened my mouth I think the answer might suddenly have come to me.
Just signing in to say well done again to Jim. It was certainly an exciting contest. I quickly found the relevant article and thus drew my lines without too much head scratching. I feel there was less cold solving in this puzzle than people seem to be suggesting, as there had to be a certain repetition of letters, which helped when one got down to the last few clues. Altogether a very entertaining offering though.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.