News1 min ago
Anyone For "Sarah's Law"?
233 Answers
Yet another kiddie fiddler has managed to ply his evil trade and has been able to groom at least one more innocent child right under its mother's nose. He has been "severely punished" with a wet lettuce leaf and given 4 months inside. (He may well have been released by the time I've finished typing!)
It proves, does it not, that the present system is deeply flawed? Maybe the introduction of "Sarah's Law", where paedos are "named, shamed" and the address of the sewer they're presently living in is made known to the wider community, would nip such atrocities in the bud?
Or do the "bleeding hearts" win the day again by arguing that the "human rights" of the pervert are far more precious than the safety of innocent children? Woops, no, we daren't risk having vigilante patrols on the streets. No, let our kids suffer instead, eh?
http://www.newsofthew...-reveal-his-name.html
It proves, does it not, that the present system is deeply flawed? Maybe the introduction of "Sarah's Law", where paedos are "named, shamed" and the address of the sewer they're presently living in is made known to the wider community, would nip such atrocities in the bud?
Or do the "bleeding hearts" win the day again by arguing that the "human rights" of the pervert are far more precious than the safety of innocent children? Woops, no, we daren't risk having vigilante patrols on the streets. No, let our kids suffer instead, eh?
http://www.newsofthew...-reveal-his-name.html
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by OrcadianOil. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I have always felt that this so called "Sarah's Law" would only make things worse, not better, thus causing more suffering. It is not in the interests of society for abusers to disappear from the authorities' vision; which there would be an incentive for abusers to do if authorities let the community know who has a conviction. Neither is it in the interest of the child for them, nor for their family, to gain a false sense of security by assuming the convicted individuals are the only danger. And vigilante gangs as not known for their level headed consideration, they offer nothing the law doesn't already cover, save vengeance maybe. The best and only sensible solution is for the authorities to know who has a record, and take sufficient action to minimise incidents.
Are they? What sort of people are repulsed by homosexuals. People who are brain dead. I don't like the thought of sex with a member of my own sex but each to his own. What people do in private has nothing to do with me whatsoever.
Sex with children is something completely different and has nothing whatsoever to do with homosexuality.
Sex with children is something completely different and has nothing whatsoever to do with homosexuality.
-- answer removed --
Returning to Orc's question:
I don't see why this case supports calls for 'Sarah's Law'.
According to the linked news report, the police were onto this guy and interceded before any harm was done.
Isn't that the idea?
Or would it be better if publicising the names of these dangerous people (in addition to the other problems it would generate) caused them to go underground and go undetected?
.
I don't see why this case supports calls for 'Sarah's Law'.
According to the linked news report, the police were onto this guy and interceded before any harm was done.
Isn't that the idea?
Or would it be better if publicising the names of these dangerous people (in addition to the other problems it would generate) caused them to go underground and go undetected?
.
Latest Posts
Please Help Me Find More Of These.....
Jokes7 mins ago
Crosswords9 mins ago
Technology17 mins ago
ChatterBank32 mins ago
