ChatterBank15 mins ago
Lets give Nick a chance
32 Answers
Ok folks forget the hype try and listen to his responses.As everyone from parents to high flyers says ignore the negative accentuate the positve.Good luck
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by bpoolmecca. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Cheeris, it wasn`t his big chance to justify his views, it was his chance to answer questions, which he did openly and honestly, unlike many MPs who go on there and fob questions off with bullshit answers and statistics.
He was a sitting target but he answered every question aimed at him from all sides, like him or loathe him at least he had the balls to say what he thinks.
He was a sitting target but he answered every question aimed at him from all sides, like him or loathe him at least he had the balls to say what he thinks.
-- answer removed --
He had the balls to say what he thinks? i dont think so - every reminder of previous racist or holocaust denial comment he had every made he ignored or said he was misquoted. He tried to insinuate that his meeting with David Duke was an attempt to moderate the KKK ffs. He refused point blank to answer a question relating to his views on holocaust denial since it might mean he would get shipped off to France or Germany for trial - this despite the fact that the UK justice secretary gave him a free speech guarantee.
False laughter at the various contemptous remarks sent his way only made him seem a simpering sycophant.
He made no valid comments and appeared evasive or just a plain liar, and plainly out of touch with modern day britain.
I was initially concerned at the prospect of the BBC giving the leader of a party with such a divisive and separatist agenda a platform of their views, but in the end he was exposed for what he was, an arrogant buffoon.
False laughter at the various contemptous remarks sent his way only made him seem a simpering sycophant.
He made no valid comments and appeared evasive or just a plain liar, and plainly out of touch with modern day britain.
I was initially concerned at the prospect of the BBC giving the leader of a party with such a divisive and separatist agenda a platform of their views, but in the end he was exposed for what he was, an arrogant buffoon.
Good words LazyGun.
ELVIS68 - I cannot disagree more.
It WAS his chance at justifying his party's stance and policy. He is the leader of a fringe political party who was invited onto a respected debate forum for the first time. A forum where most of the focus was going to be on his party and their policies. How can this be described as anything other than a big chance to justify his views??!?!
Secondly, you say he answered questions openly and honestly. I say he showed himself up on a public forum to be a shifty, evasive guttermonger of emotive clarion-calls and fear-fostering. With a side-salad of blithering ignorance. In other words, pure bullshit. Pure bullshit.
In other words, he DOESN'T have the balls to say what he thinks. He just pushes the buttons of people's insecurities with a hidden agenda of racial purity (whatever that means). Just like Hitler in fact. Except more devious and evasive.
ELVIS68 - I cannot disagree more.
It WAS his chance at justifying his party's stance and policy. He is the leader of a fringe political party who was invited onto a respected debate forum for the first time. A forum where most of the focus was going to be on his party and their policies. How can this be described as anything other than a big chance to justify his views??!?!
Secondly, you say he answered questions openly and honestly. I say he showed himself up on a public forum to be a shifty, evasive guttermonger of emotive clarion-calls and fear-fostering. With a side-salad of blithering ignorance. In other words, pure bullshit. Pure bullshit.
In other words, he DOESN'T have the balls to say what he thinks. He just pushes the buttons of people's insecurities with a hidden agenda of racial purity (whatever that means). Just like Hitler in fact. Except more devious and evasive.
-- answer removed --
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.