Donate SIGN UP

Graffiti

Avatar Image
MrBen5 | 14:16 Fri 14th Sep 2007 | News
20 Answers
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/manchester/ 6994679.stm

Hmmm, Just read this and the parents are whimpering about the sentences.
They have been to court and been found guilty.
Does anyone else think they should have just got a slapped wrist or is anyone else like me and think they deserved their sentences?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by MrBen5. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Glad they got banged up - no respect for property.

Lets hope that they start making examples out of others who break the law through petty crime and vandalism.
Should have been longer. What right have they got to spray rubbish on other peoples property.
I think it brightens up the place, it's just a shame you probably get the same for killing someone
All round to Myriads to spray paint the side of his house lol
cool
Great, let a couple of child rapists out of prison a year early to make room for these heinous villians.
Question Author
I would like to know who the 500 people who signed the petition to release them were living and how they would feel if it was their property...

We shouldnt let anyone out early to make room for anyone else.

Im surprised the 500 people can write or did they spray the paper lol
A 12 month community service orer specifically cleaning up graffiti would have been more apt and educational for the pair

It can't be long before we will be seeing

Free the Mascclesfield 2

Sprayed on every motorway bridge.
Question Author
Hmmm, why not just supply them with crayons and colouring books Gromit, that way they can be rehabliitated.
It does seem rather a harsh punishment doesn't it, so..er..good.
Great.

Now how am I supposed to find out who woz 'ere.
Approximately a year in jail for 13, 000 pounds in damages, and only four years in jail for being drugged-up, crashing, and killing three passengers?!
Would they like like graffiti on there home , no , it's out of sight out of mind . Every one is so pc , they all need a short sharp lesson .
If it's classed as criminal damage thats what they are put away for, it costs as much to make good whether its smashed up or painted on, these were not young kids but adults old enough to know better. and as for wanting to go to university, don't they need a few brains for that?
How long shall we give this guy then?

http://www.banksy.co.uk/outdoors/horizontal_1. htm

'cause they guys think he's brilliant!
lol China Doll - you're quite funny
theonlyone.

'on their home.'
To me its art - criminal damage? the brightly coloured artistic murals that adorn our otherwise drab and shoddy looking railway bridges and embankments add a bit of sparkle and stlye. Its hardly akin to spraying 'Kevin is a w****r' or 'Pompey rule OK'. Local councils have even commissioned this type of urban art to brighten up depressing inner cities - its not criminal damage then is it? Look at the work of Banksy - thats how he got started.
I hate the sort of graffiti which is just 'Debbi luvs Bazza' written in felt tip. I've seen kids hanging round train and bus stops making their rubbishy felt tip pen marks before now and ended up arguing with them to not do it because it looks awful, but they probably just come right back as soon as I've jumped on my bus.

Spray painted arty graffiti can be really nice though. The ones who use that tend to be more serious, as it obviously costs more to buy the materials and they need to take the time to work out how much space they've got and what they can draw in that space.

I've seen some amazing murals and can only wish my best to the artists that created them.

I've no knowledge of this particular case, though. Were they persistently graffiti-ing the same property, or writing inflammatory stuff or something?

1 to 20 of 20rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Graffiti

Answer Question >>