Crosswords0 min ago
Boris Won’t Apologise.
Answers
I understand the cut and thrust of political debate. However, given the recentish murders of two sitting MPs, and given the general stupidity of the population it behoves ALL MPs to take care with what they say about each other (including apologising if necessary)
14:32 Tue 08th Feb 2022
// he did fail to prosecute Savile //
No he didn’t. That is not the truth, it is a lie. And also libellous.
https:/
No he didn’t. That is not the truth, it is a lie. And also libellous.
https:/
"That Starmer had nothing 'personally' to do with decisions is a bit like saying Boris had nothing personally to do with all those in-office parties that he's subsequently become responsible for.... "
But he has admitted just that.
I don't want to start the partygate stuff yet again, but the oissue there is more Johnson's repeated economy with the truth.
I don't think Sir Keir has ever tried to claim, in relation to the Savile case, that something occurred that did not, or vice versa.
And your link about the journalists indicates that he's left the DPP by the time the Oeration Elveden prosecutions came about so Johnson's original statement is particularly unfortunate (most people don't mention the journalists: Johnson of course is a journalist)
But he has admitted just that.
I don't want to start the partygate stuff yet again, but the oissue there is more Johnson's repeated economy with the truth.
I don't think Sir Keir has ever tried to claim, in relation to the Savile case, that something occurred that did not, or vice versa.
And your link about the journalists indicates that he's left the DPP by the time the Oeration Elveden prosecutions came about so Johnson's original statement is particularly unfortunate (most people don't mention the journalists: Johnson of course is a journalist)
// Starmer… failed to act on it //
Savile was never arrested. He was never charged for anything. The CPS advised that none of the claimants were prepared to go to court so a successful prosecution was unlikely. Starmer took the advice of the CPS.
Savile was guilty but no would give evidence in court against him. So that is the reason that Savile was never charged or imprisoned.
Savile was never arrested. He was never charged for anything. The CPS advised that none of the claimants were prepared to go to court so a successful prosecution was unlikely. Starmer took the advice of the CPS.
Savile was guilty but no would give evidence in court against him. So that is the reason that Savile was never charged or imprisoned.
// he knows he would be guilty of slander.//
hmm - under the old law, it would be covered by 'fair comment'. I am sort of in Justice Cocklecarrot ( thx to private eye again) 's era. One Sir Oliver Popplewell
I think Mirza went because she said no dont ( use the Starmer gibe) and he said 'I gonna' and he did and off she flounced along with all the other Noah's
hmm - under the old law, it would be covered by 'fair comment'. I am sort of in Justice Cocklecarrot ( thx to private eye again) 's era. One Sir Oliver Popplewell
I think Mirza went because she said no dont ( use the Starmer gibe) and he said 'I gonna' and he did and off she flounced along with all the other Noah's
excuse me readers in case any one is unclear or er confused by the incessant babble
Operation Elveden
https:/
was about payments to officers - Rebekah Brokks et al. 35 arrested, 5 convicted -
not really Jimmy savile territory - but hey never mind, the point scoring AB goes on ! and arn - wowser! ( thx to they shoot horses dont they?)
Operation Elveden
https:/
was about payments to officers - Rebekah Brokks et al. 35 arrested, 5 convicted -
not really Jimmy savile territory - but hey never mind, the point scoring AB goes on ! and arn - wowser! ( thx to they shoot horses dont they?)
Maybe Savile was also being protected by the establishment ?
I suppose we will never know :
https:/
https:/
https:/
https:/
Easy to make a baseless assumption I guess ?
But anecdotal and pictorial evidence certainly helps eh ?
I suppose we will never know :
https:/
https:/
https:/
https:/
Easy to make a baseless assumption I guess ?
But anecdotal and pictorial evidence certainly helps eh ?
// Johnson of course is a journalist)//
star of the sextator scandal I seem to dimly recall
https:/
someone lying politico lied: "Boris Johnson has been dismissed from his last four jobs for dishonesty..."
and this was the first
star of the sextator scandal I seem to dimly recall
https:/
someone lying politico lied: "Boris Johnson has been dismissed from his last four jobs for dishonesty..."
and this was the first
// under the old law, it would be covered by 'fair comment'. //
Don’t think so. It is not fair to say Starmer let Savile go when he wasn’t even arrested.
Starmer as DPP oversaw the CPS. The CPS said none of the people who made allegations about Saville were prepared to go to Court and testify against him. So a successful prosecution was impossible. That was the correct decision.
Don’t think so. It is not fair to say Starmer let Savile go when he wasn’t even arrested.
Starmer as DPP oversaw the CPS. The CPS said none of the people who made allegations about Saville were prepared to go to Court and testify against him. So a successful prosecution was impossible. That was the correct decision.
Latest Posts
If An Ordinary American Citizen Faced...
News9 mins ago
Crosswords14 mins ago
Nigel Farage Making An Emergency...
News18 mins ago
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.