Donate SIGN UP

Interesting Tack From Looney Tune 1

Avatar Image
ToraToraTora | 15:26 Thu 27th Dec 2018 | News
7 Answers
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46693736
Sounds like the sort of excuse a drunk makes the morning after! Go Vern sue his weirdo April off.
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by ToraToraTora. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Although I agree it was more a case of over the top school yard rhetoric Elon Musk should have just left it at his original apology. But he didn’t he carried on.

And to say it shouldn’t be taken seriously because it all happened on social media is just childish.

When ‘public figures’ or those with the means to influularge amounts of people use social media to further their own agendas they can’t or at least shouldn’t be able to then say what they should be ignored because it’s on social media.

You either embrace it good or bad or shun it completely.

> The first amendment of the United States Constitution, which protects free speech, makes defamation a challenging legal action to bring ... the toughest hurdle is that if the person bringing the case is regarded as a public figure - and "public figure" is given a pretty wide interpretation - it has to be proved that the defendant acted maliciously ... it must be proved that the defendant knowingly lied with the intention of harming the plaintiff.

Hmm, that reads to me like Musk with his expensive lawyers has a great chance of getting away with it, which would be a disgrace.
Question Author
agreed, to label someone as a paedophile publicly with no evidence is 100% defamation.
Vernon didn't exactly help himself though; the mini-sub was never going to work, so he should have patiently pointed out to Mr Musk why, instead of just accusing him of grandstanding.
Question Author
" it must be proved that the defendant knowingly lied with the intention of harming the plaintiff. " - that's pretty well a gimme. He was hacked off that Vernon Unsworth didn't prostrate himself at his feet in gratitude enough for Musk's planet sized ego when he offered the sub, so he used the nuclear bomb of accusations intended to harm as much as possible. I don't see how any other interpretation can be put on it. Expensive lawyers or not Musk will have to settle out of court.
Not Only that, but Musk rat uses twitter and Instagram to make his point at all times and expects everyone to take his word as gospel. But now it may suit his two faced about turn, his case is that nothing on the so shall medya sites is to be taken seriously. Meeeh.
Interesting. Wonder what shareholders think of all this.

Blokes a complete and utter spanner, Go Vern.

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Interesting Tack From Looney Tune 1

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.