Donate SIGN UP

Answers

41 to 60 of 94rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Indeed, the story was for the reading public - presumably we (they) should have had to fan themselves with a crisp cotton hankie and sniffed some smelling salts,then retired to a dark room to recover.
Question Author
waterboatman

If you mean this sentence:

/// Besides; it's nobody's business but theirs. ///

Then you are wrong, they are not only 'celebrities' in the public's eye, but she is soon to be part of our Royal Family and as such 'it is much our business'.
Well then , the press has satisfied your need to know some more about her - frankly I don't feel I need to know any more.

Maybe there'll be some really raunchy revelations along soon, keep scanning the columns.
What bothers you about the fact that she’s soon to be a royal and she’s written a blog, AOG?
ZM, Isn't it obvious, considering the drift of AOG's posts?
I demand to know what colour boxers Prince Harry is wearing today. As he is a Royal I consider it to be very much my business.

There really is some tosh written on here at times.
I’d like to hear his answer, danny. You know, just for the record.
Long before any engagement / marriage was announced she would have 'vetted ' to endure nothing in her past would cause difficulty for the dynasty

She has been given the nod and obviously 'they' do not consider this anything to barr her joining the club
I'm curious what this 'past' that has caught up with her is?
I just see a young woman keeping a blog - nothing sordid or dirty going on.
Wait while the story and photos hit the headlines of her running naked round a pool table.

This is exactly the reason why I haven't read a newspaper, except our local weekly, since the phone hacking business. Rubbish
AOG - // Yes you are quite correct you do not speak for dannyk13.

Perhaps he will be along shortly and join us in my Grooming thread?

Surely he won't be able to resist using the race card on that one as well? //

I have no idea - because you don't speak for him either - but I do admit that first.
Can't see what there is to report. There doesn't seem a lot there to have caught up with her.
I guess the only thing that raises an eyebrow is what "'hustling' to reach stardom" involved given the recent #metoo revelations.

But as an ardent Republican I couldn't give a monkeys. (unless of course she can manage to bring the Monarchy down then I will be right behind her :-) )
Naomi - // Can't see what there is to report. There doesn't seem a lot there to have caught up with her. //

The Mail will never allow the flimsiness of facts to get in the way of getting itself all het up.

Like I said, the gel is a bit orrff, it's their duty to make a real mountain out of an imaginary molehill.
So what does 'hustle' mean then AH?
Mrs Simpson Mk II.
YMB - // So what does 'hustle' mean then AH? //

It was a disco dance last time I checked -

Jackdaw, that's ancient history. Times have changed.
Just shows how enlightened we’ve bcome since then, JD. And isn’t it AOG who says things were always better in the past? Maybe he thinks Meghan should be treated the same way.

41 to 60 of 94rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is Meghan's Past Already Catching Up With Her?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.