Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 56rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Avatar Image
As far as I am concerned, circumcision of boys is an entirely unnecessary operation, unless done for medical reasons. To say it is done for religious reasons just adds to the seriousness of the assault charge. As far as this case is concerned, the Doctor proceeded with the circumcision without the consent of the parents, and I fail to see why he has been let off...
14:45 Fri 10th Nov 2017
No, circumcision is legal in the UK with parental consent.
Unless a medical necessity, it's time it was made illegal. This is wilful mutilation.
Rather a trained professional than a back street 'expert'
I have often wondered why girls are injected with the anti HPV virus as teens when circumcision of boys would cut the number of women getting cervical cancer......... seems a bit unfair to me.
//Rather a trained professional than a back street 'expert' //

So do you extend that thought to FGM?
Not the same thing really is it - one is legal one isn't.
Legal or not it's mutilation.
It does become the same thing because you used the statement as an argument against making circumcision illegal.
/because you used the statement as an argument against making circumcision illegal. /
Nope didn't make an arguement against making it illegal, I stated a fact.
Its not only done for religious reason either, all the males in our family are done and we are not religious.
Islay, All the males in your family having had bits chopped of them doesn't make mutilating children right.
*off*
Islay
Naomi "Unless a medical necessity, it's time it was made illegal. This is wilful mutilation. "
You : "Rather a trained professional than a back street 'expert' "
How on earth can you say you were not using the argument against it being illegal?

I am genuinely confused.
In your opinion Naomi. Whilst it is still legal I am sure that there are many parents that will continue to do so.
Men having a bit of useless skin chopped off in a family ensures that their wives and girlfriends are less likely to develop cancer.....well done that family I say.
I wasn't answering anyone with my first answer.
MallyJ, would you like to post a link to a recognized source (such as the NHS) that proves your claim?
Islay, //Whilst it is still legal I am sure that there are many parents that will continue to do so. //

I've no doubt whatsoever that you're right. However, in this particular instance the parent didn't give permission. Is that okay with you too?
Those who carry out this surgical practice do so under the guise of a "medical condition" where circumcision is indicated. More often than not NHS surgeons refuse to perform the surgery for religious purposes.
Question Author
mallyj, W_TF are you on about?

1 to 20 of 56rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Why Are Doctors Performing Religious Mutilation?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.