Donate SIGN UP

Is The Labour Party The Nasty Racist Party?

Avatar Image
youngmafbog | 12:45 Tue 26th Sep 2017 | News
43 Answers
The Equality and Human Rights Commission seem to think so.

Labour has been branded the 'new nasty party' after an outbreak of intimidation
The BBC's Laura Kuenssberg has been reported as having to have a bodyguard. Now I dont like the woman but having to have a body guard at a major parties conference?

Seems the Nasty violent Left are starting to show thei true colours.

What I want to know is why the police have not been involved. If this was a 'far' right party plod would be wading in thick and fast.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4920644/Labour-not-racist-warns-watchdog.html


Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 43rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by youngmafbog. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"The previous day, at a series of fringe meetings there had been demands that the Jewish Labour Movement – affiliated to the Labour Party for 97 years – should be expelled. Because it is the Jewish Labour Movement.

Leaflets have been circulated comparing Israelis and Jews with Nazis."
// Re: the intimidation - if it's happening, it's awful. But I do question the story a bit, as Kuenssberg having a security detail is not all that unusual given her profile. On the other hand, there is genuine vitriol and hatred against her among Corbynistas over what I think was probably professional laziness or a mistake rather than an outright attempt to smear the Dear Leader. //

I agree. Many of them seethe with vitriol and hatred for alot of things, much more so than the equivalent right wingers.

The worst you can say about the Tories I know is that they're ambivalent and uncaring towards the poor, but they don't actively hate them. Contrast this to some Labour supporters who loathe 'the rich' and would happily cart them off to the guillotine given half a chance, along with the Blairite traitors of course. Keunssberg would probably escape the death penalty but be sent to a gulag for ten years for re-education.
I don't know, Ludwig, if we're going to get into making comparisons I'm not sure it's that clear-cut. As I've said before I've had multiple and prolonged interactions Tory party members who took great pleasure in being obnoxious and abusive for the sheer pleasure of it. Plus you'll remember there have been multiple bullying scandals within the Tory party - one of which explicitly drove one of their activists to suicide and got Grant Shapps into major trouble. Then you have instances (one of which happened in my hometown) of Tory members burning money in front of the homeless as an initiation rite.

And I'm also not sure that ambivalencece/indifference is necessarily less dangerous than hatred. That attitude is scarcely less damaging than hatred when it comes to the disabled - who are being actively harmed by recent Tory policy, as was recently declared by the UN.
Krom, after yesterday’s revelations anyone who wants to continue to defend the Labour Party is going to be scratching around – as you seem to be doing. Even Mikey is conspicuous by his absence on these latest threads.
I'm not defending them, I said it's awful.
Krom, You're not? There seems to be an awful lot of proverbial 'buts' and Tory bashing in your previous post... but hey ho. If you say so.
I was responding to a comparison that another poster was making, yeah.

I'm a bit confused by this implicit suggestion that I'm some dyed-in-the-wool Red fanatic. I joined the party briefly last year because I wanted to vote in the leadership election (but then wasn't allowed, and I let my membership expire). I didn't vote for them in the election, and I've never voted for them in any of the general elections I've been eligible to vote in.
// As I've said before I've had multiple and prolonged interactions Tory party members who took great pleasure in being obnoxious and abusive for the sheer pleasure of it. //

I can believe it. Party members of any type aren't to be trusted in my opinion. I was talking more about supporters - ie people who habitually vote one way or another, without being weird enough to actually sign up to the club. I personally hear far more bile and nastiness from my left leaning aquaintances than those on the right. They think it's ok though, because obviously they only hate the people that's it's ok to hate.
Kromo; I'm not sure being anti-monarchy is *quite* as serious a problem as anti-semitism.//

True, it's really about numbers as well as attitude; to be anti-monarchy is wishing to remove a handful of people who are the figurehead and standard bearers of a nation - and of whom many people around the world seem to be envious of.
To be anti-Semitic is to wish to remove, as Hamas and the world's Islamists do, 15 million people from the face of the earth.
As much as I dislike the current Labour party and it's leader, I'm not convinced about the anti-semitism thing. I think that in the same way anyone who wants to discuss immigration or suggest the EU isn't wonderful is immediately branded a racist as a way of shutting down that discussion, the same technique is used against anyone that wants to criticise Israel.

It's difficult to have much sympathy though, as being historically the main players of the racism card, Labour are now being hoist by their own petard.
These days the real fascist are on the Left. The unholy alliance between the far Left and militant Islam is just another manifestation of the Left's fascination with Hitler(think red Ken Livingstone) and the tendency of Jezza to bend a knee to Hezbolah. In the guise of hating anything approaching success and bestowing victimhood on the would be genocidal maniacs. The Jewish community have been successful and therefore "oppressors", but also pro Israel, which is the worst crime in their book. The old Blackshirts are now wearing red ties instead and call themselves momentum. Today, 81 years after Cable St who could have imagined that Labour party members would be applauding anti Semitic rants and Holocaust denial? Oh yes the nasty party indeed and very dangerous.
Khandro
Not wanting a Jewish state on their doorstep does not mean they want to exterminate 15 million people.

I would rather North Korea didn't exist, but I do not wish the 25 million North Koreans were removed from the world.
Are you comparing the State of Israel with the N. Korean regime gromit? That is a perfect example, is it not, of the skewed far left. See above^^
Ludwig, //As much as I dislike the current Labour party and it's leader, I'm not convinced about the anti-semitism thing.//

The Labour party is historically anti-Zionist but most of their supporters don’t appear to know the difference between anti-Semitism and anti-Zionism. The red mist melds the two together. Ken Livingstone’s ignorant nonsense about Hitler having been a Zionist is a good example.
Khandro
// Leaflets have been circulated comparing Israelis and Jews with Nazis." //

A lie. Certinly a statement without any evidence to back it up.
The Israeli Government can be compared the Nazis, and that is fair comment and justifiable under free speech. To say Jews [presumably all Jews] are nazis, is an hate crime and falls foul of UK.
If Stephen Pollard, whos words you quote really saw that, he should have reported it to the police and had them arrested. Or better still publish the offending leaflets and pictures of people distributing them, and name and shame them.
Mr Pollard is editor of the Jewish Chronicle so it is amazing he has done neither action. I suspect he sees any criticism of Israel as anti Jew and anti semitic.
If there were leaflets comparing Jews to Nazis, the I condemn them and their authors are prosecuted. But without the evidence, I am sceptical that such material was at the official Labour Conference.
Togo,
My comparison was not about the country states, it was about wishing countries to not exist. It does not mean you want everyone who lives there to be murdered, if you wish the country wasn't there.
But some comparisons can be made. They are both rogue states that ignore international law.
""Speakers who compared Zionists to Hitler's genocidal Nazis were applauded by delegates at an event advertised in the official conference guidebook""

Phew....that alright then.
The Jewish Chronicle, of which Pollard is Editor, actually gets it right in todays edition.

// The situation was bad enough yesterday - when Israel was compared to the Nazis //

No mention of Jews being compared to the Nazis.
//They are both rogue states that ignore international law.//
Yep gromit actually wrote that.
As we speak.
List of US and EU sanctions against rogue state Israel.

Err None!

List of US and EU sanctions against N.Korea.
- embargo on arms and related materiel
- ban on exports of certain goods and technology
- prohibition of procurement from DPRK of arms, related materiel and other goods and technology
- ban on provision of certain services
- ban on provision of new DPRK banknotes and coins
- ban on trade in gold, precious metals and diamonds with the Government of DPRK
- ban on exports of luxury goods
- ban on public provided financial support for trade where such support could contribute to DPRK’s nuclear-related, ballistic missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes
- ban on new commitments for grants, financial assistance and concessional loans to the DPRK
- enhanced monitoring of the activities of EU financial institutions with banks domiciled in DPRK and their subsidiaries, branches and other financial entities outside DPRK
- restrictions on establishment of branches and subsidiaries of and cooperation with DPRK banks
- restrictions on issuance of and trade in certain bonds
- inspection of and prior information requirement on cargoes to and from DPRK
- restrictions on access to EU airports for certain flights
- ban on provision of certain services to certain vessels and aircraft
- restrictions on admission for certain persons
- freezing of funds and economic resources
- measures to prevent certain specialised teaching or training
- enhanced vigilance over DPRK diplomatic personnel
- prohibition to satisfy certain claims made by certain persons, entities and bodies
- ban on import and purchase of goods and technology (which could contribute to North Korea's nuclear-related, other weapons of mass destruction-related or ballistic missile-related programmes)
- ban on provision of certain services (related to such goods and technology)
- ban on exports of luxury goods
- additional ban on exports and imports of certain goods and technology which could contribute to DPRK’s nuclear-related, ballistic missile-related or other weapons of mass destruction-related programmes
- prior information requirement on cargoes to and from DPRK
- measures to be applied by EU credit and financial institutions to exercise vigilance over their activities with banks domiciled in DPRK and their subsidiaries, branches and other financial entities outside DPRK
- restrictions on access to EU ports for certain vessels
- ban on provision to certain DPRK vessels of bunkering and ship supply services
- restrictions on certain flights (EU airports, overflight)
You could have saved that copy and pasting Togo, I am well aware that the US and UK use their UN veto to block any sanctions against Israel.
It is their failed project after all.

21 to 40 of 43rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Is The Labour Party The Nasty Racist Party?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.