Arts & Literature2 mins ago
Are These The Type Of People Who The More Civilised Are Defined As Racist If They Dare To State That They Are Superior To Them?
42 Answers
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.Well, in the first place, what the heck do you mean by "we"?
But I don't mean to make any point other than saying that it's racist to regard yourself as innately superior to someone based on your race v. theirs. Which is pretty self-evident, really. As to what this adds to the discussion -- well, I don't think it does really.
But I don't mean to make any point other than saying that it's racist to regard yourself as innately superior to someone based on your race v. theirs. Which is pretty self-evident, really. As to what this adds to the discussion -- well, I don't think it does really.
After reading the question several times, I think I've got the gist.
My answer is this - I think that we are way more enlightened than those who still believe in witchcraft, and we absolutely hold a moral superiority to anyone who kills, full stop.
However, anyone who then uses a story like this, and extrapolates to suggest that one race is superior to another based on this, is inferior to the rest of us.
My answer is this - I think that we are way more enlightened than those who still believe in witchcraft, and we absolutely hold a moral superiority to anyone who kills, full stop.
However, anyone who then uses a story like this, and extrapolates to suggest that one race is superior to another based on this, is inferior to the rest of us.
I also find the question a little confused, but I will answer based on what I understand the question to be -
I would define myself as superior to anyone who thinks that removing bits of other people without their consent is acceptable.
That is because such an act is barbaric in the extreme.
The ethnicity of the perpetrator is not a factor in reaching that view, so I fail to see how racism enters the equation.
In short - yes I am delighted to consider myself superior to these individuals, but that is because of their actions, not their origins.
I would define myself as superior to anyone who thinks that removing bits of other people without their consent is acceptable.
That is because such an act is barbaric in the extreme.
The ethnicity of the perpetrator is not a factor in reaching that view, so I fail to see how racism enters the equation.
In short - yes I am delighted to consider myself superior to these individuals, but that is because of their actions, not their origins.
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.