ChatterBank9 mins ago
Leon Brittan
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Daffy6543. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
mikey
"deal with the problem". Are you dealing with the problem? All you are doing is dredging up the same subject and for what purpose? Your are a little fish in a big pond. Tell us what influence you have "in dealing with the problem"
If you are truly in the know about who did what and when then it is your public duty to disclose your information to the relevant authorities and not keep repeating on this site your vast knowledge and insider knowledge. Have you reported your facts to the relevant authorities yet? If not why not? If your information comes from a book that,again,you repeatedly promote then just give it a rest.Yes, we now, know the book and we can read it for ourselves if we wish. I ask again. What is your true agenda on this subject? Political point scoring or "dealing with the problem" Believe me, judging by the posts before this, ABers seem to be thoroughly cheesed off with your repetitious rants on this subject. Don't keep telling us what you think you know. Tell the authorities what you do actually know. I await your reply as to the question,"What is your agenda?" because "dealing with the problem" on this site is not the answer.
"deal with the problem". Are you dealing with the problem? All you are doing is dredging up the same subject and for what purpose? Your are a little fish in a big pond. Tell us what influence you have "in dealing with the problem"
If you are truly in the know about who did what and when then it is your public duty to disclose your information to the relevant authorities and not keep repeating on this site your vast knowledge and insider knowledge. Have you reported your facts to the relevant authorities yet? If not why not? If your information comes from a book that,again,you repeatedly promote then just give it a rest.Yes, we now, know the book and we can read it for ourselves if we wish. I ask again. What is your true agenda on this subject? Political point scoring or "dealing with the problem" Believe me, judging by the posts before this, ABers seem to be thoroughly cheesed off with your repetitious rants on this subject. Don't keep telling us what you think you know. Tell the authorities what you do actually know. I await your reply as to the question,"What is your agenda?" because "dealing with the problem" on this site is not the answer.
Mikey,
Anything I say to you on this site is something I would happily debate with you face to face. I do not have to hide behind anonymity or take advantage of it as you obviously are doing.
Do you think you could stand on your soapbox at speakers corner and spout what accusations you have about other people. You would be answering slander charges before your feet touched the ground.
Anonymity and Trust.
Why should I trust you and what you say? You hide behind anonymity and betray a trust as well don't you? You related that "in the course of your work you visited a house and the parents told you their daughter was called Styxx because they liked the name.When they fell short of your vast knowledge of the classics and Greek mythology and did not know the connection of the name you told us all they were daft parents".
If I lived in S.Wales your foot wouldn't cross my threshold as you blab to all and betray a private conversation. I suppose you ascertained that the family weren't abers before you told us this gossip didn't you. I would suggest your anonymity is the only thing that protects your job.
You also told us your S-I-L was stupid or dim on another OP last year. Did you really need to betray that information. You are now untrustworthy as well as hypocritical.
I notice on the link about Jim Hood (Labour MP) that he was censored for mentioning the subject of this thread's name.What was his cringing and whining reply in the great tradition of gossips, "Well I am only repeating what I heard the miners say when in the dock answering criminal charges that they did not feel it right to answer charges whilst the Home Secretary is thought to be connected with child abuse" When censored again he said," I am only reading what I see in the paper"
Honestly mikey. Do you write this MP's scripts? Don't tell me you also urged him to buy Smile for the Camera as well.
For your information the "likes of me" never mourned the death of Savile.
I got the impression from personal observations that he believed he was above the law on other matters long before he was connected with child abuse. I have no time for untalented clowns who were overpaid for playing records and making silly noises as well as being an outrageous exhibitionist. So you can see I was never a fan of that man and you didn't "tell me so" either.
Anything I say to you on this site is something I would happily debate with you face to face. I do not have to hide behind anonymity or take advantage of it as you obviously are doing.
Do you think you could stand on your soapbox at speakers corner and spout what accusations you have about other people. You would be answering slander charges before your feet touched the ground.
Anonymity and Trust.
Why should I trust you and what you say? You hide behind anonymity and betray a trust as well don't you? You related that "in the course of your work you visited a house and the parents told you their daughter was called Styxx because they liked the name.When they fell short of your vast knowledge of the classics and Greek mythology and did not know the connection of the name you told us all they were daft parents".
If I lived in S.Wales your foot wouldn't cross my threshold as you blab to all and betray a private conversation. I suppose you ascertained that the family weren't abers before you told us this gossip didn't you. I would suggest your anonymity is the only thing that protects your job.
You also told us your S-I-L was stupid or dim on another OP last year. Did you really need to betray that information. You are now untrustworthy as well as hypocritical.
I notice on the link about Jim Hood (Labour MP) that he was censored for mentioning the subject of this thread's name.What was his cringing and whining reply in the great tradition of gossips, "Well I am only repeating what I heard the miners say when in the dock answering criminal charges that they did not feel it right to answer charges whilst the Home Secretary is thought to be connected with child abuse" When censored again he said," I am only reading what I see in the paper"
Honestly mikey. Do you write this MP's scripts? Don't tell me you also urged him to buy Smile for the Camera as well.
For your information the "likes of me" never mourned the death of Savile.
I got the impression from personal observations that he believed he was above the law on other matters long before he was connected with child abuse. I have no time for untalented clowns who were overpaid for playing records and making silly noises as well as being an outrageous exhibitionist. So you can see I was never a fan of that man and you didn't "tell me so" either.
Retrocop...you say that
"I got the impression from personal observations that he (Savile) believed he was above the law on other matters long before he was connected with child abuse"
So I am still not sure here. At what point did you realise that he was a paedophile ?
1...Was it before died
2..Was it after he died, but before he was exposed.
3..or was it after he was exposed by the ITV documentary in October 2012 ?
Savile was investigated by the Police, for sexual abuse long before he died, so it shouldn't have come as much of the shock when the full truth emerged.
But when did YOU come to that conclusion ?
"I got the impression from personal observations that he (Savile) believed he was above the law on other matters long before he was connected with child abuse"
So I am still not sure here. At what point did you realise that he was a paedophile ?
1...Was it before died
2..Was it after he died, but before he was exposed.
3..or was it after he was exposed by the ITV documentary in October 2012 ?
Savile was investigated by the Police, for sexual abuse long before he died, so it shouldn't have come as much of the shock when the full truth emerged.
But when did YOU come to that conclusion ?
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Latest Posts
News18 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles23 mins ago
ChatterBank26 mins ago
Crosswords34 mins ago
Quizzes & Puzzles86 mins ago
