Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

41 to 60 of 77rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by mikey4444. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'm not loathe to admit that Keyplus has a point. He does. However, his point doesn't absolve the behaviour of his countrymen who think that any girl who doesn't behave as their daughters or sisters behave is fair game for abuse and degradation.
-- answer removed --
Maybe Jimmy Savile was a Pakistani-born Catholic?
divebuddy, how unfair? I've admitted he has a point - but I await his response to my question.
He certainly was not condoning the actions of Pakistani male-youth; I think his point is a good one and should be looked at as a part of the mix of unravelling this unholy mess and taking things forward in some constructive manner, hopefully along the secular lines that I (and others) have been advocating.
-- answer removed --
divebuddy, Don't be ridiculous! Keyplus is a Pakistani. I'm not implying he behaves like this. He very clearly doesn't!
-- answer removed --
Look, Keyplus made a fair point and raised issues which Naomi has asked a reasonsble and relevant question in return about exploitation and degradation. She has not implied all Pakistanis. As ChillDoubt stated the use of the word 'willing' looks very clumsy to say the least...
I have no idea what you think you're reading, but it's not what's there. Try again - and try harder this time.

I'm going to bed. Night.
^That was to divebuddy.
-- answer removed --
I'm still here. Say what you want to say. I'll wait.
Still no sign of Mikey!
db, can we keep personalities out of this as this and other Rotherham threads do express some valuable thoughts and ideas and, just maybe, someone in Central Office and No 10 picks up on what we are debating, delusional that I am!
I'm a patient soul, divebuddy, but twenty plus minutes? I can only assume you have nothing to say.

Night all.
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Naomi was quite right. Those young troubled girls were admittedly out late at night, and lacked supervision. But it does not excuse the behaviour of those gangs who targetted them and groomed them. It is a cultural thing with them which I find disturbing, particularly working in gangs, their willingness to degrade white children and treating females as trash imo is mockery to British society who have to put up with their demands and cries of racism at every turn. Keyplus made a good point about their supervision, young Asian girls are not alllowed so much freedom. And he is certainly not in agreement with their behaviour. Had this been perpetrated against Asian girls by white men the Council would have been running around in circles.
-- answer removed --

41 to 60 of 77rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Another Non-Pakistani Paedophile

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.