Donate SIGN UP

The Niqab Rears It's Ugly Head Once Again.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 12:33 Wed 11th Sep 2013 | News
75 Answers
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2416632/Muslim-students-banned-wearing-niqab-Birmingham-Met-college-security-reasons.html

Was this college right to make this ruling?

/// Imaani Ali, 17, believes the ban on veils is a breach of her freedom ///

There are many things in life that breach our 'FREEDOM' Imaani Ali, they are mainly called 'RULES'.

Gravatar

Answers

21 to 40 of 75rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Is it really her wish to wear a Niqab OR is it the menfolk in her family who instructs her to wear it .

I suspect it's the latter
youngmafbog, I am deeply concerned that things keep rearing their ugly heads at anotheoldgit.

If it's not feminism

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1261835.html

or human rights

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1063716-3.html

it's the EU symbol

http://www.theanswerbank.co.uk/News/Question1036883.html

I don't know why he is victimised in this fashion, but the poor chap sees ugliness all around him.
Put the student under the sharia law of 'no education for girls' so they can live within the concepts of their faith; and NO prospects of employment as allah wishes.

C'mon keyplus, quote the relavant koran dictum ?
gromit; Why would everyone have to get out of their cars to identify themselves? On the subject of security, I recently played golf with a CIA bodyguard for VIP's - really, (he was black and from Texas). I told him how I had recently observed an elderly, rather frail looking couple having to remove their shoes with great inconvenience at the airport and how I thought it was absurd. He said " If terrorists discovered that elderly frail people were being treated as exceptions, the first thing they would do is start figuring out a way to use that", I saw his point.
Agree with trt and baz.
Question Author
Gromit

/// Dame Christine Braddock took the decision: ///

Wrong, she only defended the policy, which had been in place for some time.

*** Principal and chief executive of the college. Dame Christine Braddock, defended the policy, saying it had been in place for some time and had been developed to keep students safe. ***


Question Author
jno

I could also say "jno rears his/her ugly head once again", but that would be not only personal, abusive, offensive but also damn right rude, so I won't.

If it's ensconced in a Niqab, how the heck do you know it's ugly?
And of course, listening/cheating devices could be concealed under the veil and the scarf. Ban them, particularly during exam time.
/There are many things in life that breach our 'FREEDOM' Imaani Ali, they are mainly called 'RULES'/

Which doesn't make them right of course - or immune to change. Clearly, /Rules/ are just a device, and the young lady might well counter that wearing a veil is also a /RULE/

What I think is more relevant is whether people routinely concealing their face from others is a healthy development when we are accustomed to a more open society and not one where women, are people in general, are restricted and thought of in this peculiar manner
As i understand it there is no religous requirement for the object to be worn - it's purely a choice .
In the interest of security , in the current climate ; it's a choice that is reasonably justified to be denied in certain instances
Question Author
Baldric

/// If it's ensconced in a Niqab, how the heck do you know it's ugly? ///

Who said anything about the wearer being ugly, my headline refers to the Niqab.

*** The Niqab Rears It's Ugly Head Once Again. ***
the Mail uses the word "security" in its headline but the college has not. They just talk about providing a "safe and welcoming environment". They give no reason why a niqab might be unsafe.
jno - i think ' safe ' in this case is that they are able to be sure that the person under the object is who they profess to be , thus not putting at risk it's students , employees and others
'Groundhog Day'
Communication is very necessary in education. Communicating with someone hiding her face is very difficult.
Bazile, at any given time in college I would be in a room with anything up to 200 other people and hadn't a clue who any of them were, bar the odd friend. I survived without feeling unwelcome. I'm not sure why today's students need to be protected like this.
/a "safe and welcoming environment"/

well lots of people wearing masks certainly challenges the /welcoming/ part

'Hello and welcome; I am smiling at you - honest I am!'
sp1814, it's true, I never quite know which anti-niqab thread I'm on.
/200 other people and hadn't a clue who any of them were/

but jno

you were able to tell whether you knew any of them or not because you could see their faces

imagine you are in a room surrounded by 200 people you don't know

get a feeling for that

now

imagine you are in a room surrounded by 200 people all wearing hoods over their faces

are you seriously saying your feelings about your situation don't change?

21 to 40 of 75rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

The Niqab Rears It's Ugly Head Once Again.

Answer Question >>