Donate SIGN UP

Princess Di. New 'evidence'?

Avatar Image
Zacs-Master | 17:33 Sat 17th Aug 2013 | News
58 Answers
No details at the moment but very intriguing.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-23741483
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 58rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Zacs-Master. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
can't they leave this be, she has been dead for so long now, poor woman... and poor family...
:(
Surely the insurance has been paid out by now....
For goodness' sake, leave her be - what good will this do now?
It surely depends on what the new evidence is. If it overturns the current story and finds someone new to blame, correctly, for the death, it should matter that the story comes out. Otherwise that person (or people) would have escaped justice, which is surely even worse?

Sounds peripheral. Perhaps the poor woman's phone was being hacked, or there is evidence of perjury or interfering with (British) justice.
While it's distressing to rake it all up IF there was some underhand factor then someone should be brought to justice. Her death, likes JFK's, will continue to cause conjecture until the truth is known, so probably always.
Question Author
Must be upsetting for her immediate family, I agree but I also agree with Jim.
The Times is now reporting that the information "is believed" to have come from the parents-in-law of a former soldier who had claimed that the Princess was killed by a member of the military.
Just another excuse for The Mail and The Express to print photos of Saint Diana.
"Murdered by a British soldier"? Where did he come from then??
Nothing would surprise me.
If it was a member of the public surely no-one would mind if the truth was confirmed?
Hang on, is Prince Philip still regarded as 'a member of the military' ?
"For goodness' sake, leave her be - what good will this do now?"

You'll be familiar with Operation Yewtree and the investigation of historical alleged offences.
Same thing really
Naughty Fred ;-)
Well, maybe the age of the truth will out will change things for the better, stop certain things being swept under the carpet and turned a blind eye to by the people in the know, like Operation Yewtree enquiries, and encourage the behaviour to repeat itself.

Much as I'm a believer that there are some things I'd rather not know there is benefit in certain things not being covered up and guilty parties being able to get away with crimes, I include the phone hacking scandal and the way some of the gutter press operate in that.
i honestly cant believe all the people that say ''let her rest in peace'' and ''why drag this up all again''...if new evidence has come to light that 3 people were murdered,yes 3,lets not forget the driver and dodi fayed too,then they should be caught and tried for murder...its called getting justice...and im sure all families involved would want to see that for their loved ones..
Agree with stokemaverick - we either bury all the past crimes whatever they were, or we try to get justice for all.

Fred - that was the first thing that came to mind!!



agree with stokemaverick, you don't stop investigating unusual deaths just in case it upsets people. If they've got evidence (though it sounds rather third-hand) it should be looked into.

1 to 20 of 58rss feed

1 2 3 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Princess Di. New 'evidence'?

Answer Question >>