Donate SIGN UP

In a word . . . .

Avatar Image
sir.prize | 23:40 Wed 25th Apr 2012 | News
113 Answers
Gravatar

Answers

101 to 113 of 113rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sir.prize. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
My grand parents, uncles and aunts all played an active role in my upbringing.

That's good ummmmm. But in a situation where there are no grandparents, uncles or aunts, and all other things being equal, do you think it would be preferable for a child to have two parents of the same sex, or two parents of a different sexes? I think the latter.
bazwillrun

What you may see as patronizing is only me trying desperately to help you understand simple facts.

Oh...I see what you mean.

Seriously - the whole nonsense about people hijacking words should be dropped now. I mean, are you equally upset that the word 'straight' now means heterosexual rather than 'direct' or 'not wavy'?
"Seriously - the whole nonsense about people hijacking words should be dropped now"

Oh I get it, you decide the agenda on this site now do you ?
I think it's preferable to have a Mother and a Father.

But I also think gay couples can make excellent parents and they shouldn't be denied a family.
I completely agree ummmm.
sp1814

/// Why are children of same-sex relationships at a
disadvantage. ///

It is swings and roundabouts, one could say are children from a very poor family at a disadvantage? Of course they are in some aspects, so the same could be said for children of same sex parents.

/// I'm happy to be educated on this, because I've read a few studies from US universities which have concluded the very opposite. ///

There are also studies that prove they are at a disadvantage.

http://factsaboutyout...ts-at-a-disadvantage/
AOG 'Does one need to be romantic and loving to enjoy sex'

Love and romance are different. To me anyway. For me to enjoy sex it has to be with someone I love....but they don't have to constantly loving. It's a whole package. You can tell when someone loves you by their day to day behaviour. What happens in the bedroom can be loving but it can also just be an urge...where love isn't thought about.
I have no strong feelings about the "sex" of the parents, just so long as they are a loving couple. My only concern in this case would be that the child/children would be brought up in the care of nannies and be sent to boarding schools because of the parents' lifestyles which involves lots of travel. Remember seeing the Queen coming back from a long trip and greeting Prince Charles with a handshake!! Having said that, Diana was very "hands on" so maybe the times they are a changing.
Gromit. Firstly I did not make a comment to create an argument.[i
so you posted so everyone would agree with you?

[i]Secondly it is nice to know that you will allow me to have an opinion.[i]
Even if I wanted to deny you an opinion (which I don't), there is no way I could prevent you from giving one.

[i]Thirdly - how did I arrive at that view? Probably my perfectly normal upbringing, Gromit.[i]
Why deliberately evade the question? Are you unable to back up your comment with reasonable facts?

[i]Finally - yes it was my view, and others on here have differing opinions. That does not make them or even me wrong.[i]
One word comments are not wrong, they are lazy and unhelpful.

You still seem unable to define why it is [i]Pathetic.]
The italicy thingy seems hit and miss.
/// AOG 'Does one need to be romantic and loving to enjoy sex' ///

That was my suggestion of a thread simply mirrored around your statement about love, romance, and sex, it was in no way my view on love, romance and sex.

/// You can tell when someone loves you by their day to day behaviour. What happens in the bedroom can be loving but it can also just be an urge...where love isn't thought about. ///

I agree with the first sentence of your statement, but then after that you lost me completely???????????????

Almost like saying by tidying up in the bedroom after the mess the one you love had made, was simply an act of love.

But then again it could just be an urge to keep things nice and tidy, without a single thought about love in one's mind. :0)
Because people have sex just because they enjoy it. There doesn't have to be a romantic build up. When you have kids at home sometimes you just grab the opportunity if they've gone out.

People display love and affection without expecting sex from it.

It's very hard to explain :-)
sir.prize, by 'pathetic' do you mean 'evoking sympathy' or 'ludicrously or contemptibly uninteresting or worthless', or one of the other definitions of the word?
I'm with you if it's 'ludicrously uninteresting'. The law allows and people tolerate homosexual couples having children by surrogacy, as they tolerate heterosexual couples doing so. It's natural for a couple to want a second child as a brother or sister to the first, thinking that, apart from anything else, an only child will not be as happy as a sibling.
If the age of the couple here is the concern, well, yes, they are both of an age when a woman would not be becoming a parent and one parent would be quite young. But that was the case with the first child. Why is it a matter of news and comment now?.

101 to 113 of 113rss feed

First Previous 3 4 5 6

Do you know the answer?

In a word . . . .

Answer Question >>