Donate SIGN UP

"We know what you are Anton Ferdinand, we know what you are"

Avatar Image
Gromit | 09:51 Wed 02nd Nov 2011 | News
89 Answers
Sang by 1,100 Chelsea supporting morons last night.

http://www.telegraph....-from-the-stands.html

Whatever can they mean?
Gravatar

Answers

61 to 80 of 89rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
"We know what you are Anton Ferdinand, we know what you are"

It would hardly stand up in a court of law now would it?
anotheoldgit writes,

“In this case, a black person is given the privilege of being able to get the police to look into the case of a white person who may have been insulting towards him.

A white person, would not be given the same privilege. “

It’s been widely reported that the complaint was made by a member of the public, not Ferdinand.

Do you have ANY proof that a white person can not be racially insulted?

“Conflicting arguments here, let's get it straight is it about 'race' or is it about having a 'black' skin?

Since there are many races in the world ...”


“jackthehat

/// Erm.....Someone displaying a skin colour different from your own is from another race. ///

That is incorrect, we are all Homo sapiens.and we belong to one race that being the Human Race.”

I am confused, is it one race or many???????

Luckily, what you think the definition of race is immaterial since it is defined in legislation. The Crown Prosecution Service website states,

“Racial group – this means any group of people who are defined by reference to their race, colour, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origin. This could include Gypsies and Travellers, refugees, or asylum seekers or others from less visible minorities. There has been a legal ruling that Jews and Sikhs are included in the definition of racial group”
"Do you have ANY proof that a white person can not be racially insulted?"

As you see, the definition is very open and a whhite person can be a victiim of a racist incident or crime. A black person could also racially abuse another black person..
exdc, was the post addressed to me or was it for anotheoldgit?
Hi Corbyloon

It was a general answer to the comment "Do you have ANY proof that a white person can not be racially insulted".
AHH okay, wasn't sure if you were agreeing wi anotheoldgit or no.
I don't know who made the comment but just trying to point out that racism, in accordance with law, is not just about skin colour.
It was anotheoldgit, who'd have guessed that, eh?
In fairness, AOG's posted timed 1231hrs, is seeking advice on a certain matters. The use of the term racist / racism can be confusing to some (as can be seen on this thread) and there are many who believe or consider rascism only refers to skin colour etc.
In one post he said there are many races, in another, there is only one. I think it's all getting too much for him.
bazwillrun

Are you kidding?

Tell you what - go to the Daily Mail website, type in 'London riot arrest' into their search box and get back to me.

I understand you may be trying to make a point, but you are so very, very, very wrong. Surely you know that, don't you?

Or are your just pulling my leg?
You need to get your blinkers off.

The riots were started by blacks, or do you deny that fact ? but that is convenientyl shoved aside to concentrate on all other sorts of figures and breakdown of the people involved in the following days of jump-on-the bandwagon chancers.
bazwillrun

I have no idea what newspaper you read, but whatever it is, you should stop subscribing, because it's full of nonsense. I read The Guardian, Independent and Observer, and there was no hiding the fact that the London riots were predominantly carried out by black teenagers, and the Manchester ones by white teenagers.

I think you may have a bit of a chip on your shoulder - one could even suggest that like a certain other person on AB, you're simply playing the race card.
"I think you may have a bit of a chip on your shoulder"

best laugh i've had all day apart from your other predictable comments -
"simply playing the race card" another classic

"that like a certain other person on AB" so now you resort to casting aspersions, or would you like to actually name names so we know who youre referring to
THECORBYLOON

My reference to there being only one race, 'The Human Race' was just a point I was trying to get over, and in no way intended for anyone to take it literally.

But you always have one, so I suppose I should have been prepared to make allowances for some, who may not quite be up to it.

/// AHH okay, wasn't sure if you were agreeing wi anotheoldgit or no. ///

And we can't allow that can we?
bazwillrun

Good one, yes there are some who have more 'chips' than Harry Ramsdens.
aog you don't need to make any allowances for me, I can assure you. What about presenting any proof for the claim a white person would not have the privilege of a police investigation?
THECORBYLOON

Some people just make stuff up as they go along.

bazwillrun - I challenge you to produce evidence that there was a conspiracy to hide the fact that London rioters were overwhelmingly black.

Go on.

I will then post some links to Sky News, the BBC, The Guardian, The Sun, The Mirror, The Evening Standard, Metro, The Daily Telegraph (I could go on but you get the picture).

Seriously, you should really stop playing the victim. You and other other person whom I won't dignify with a mention.

It's fine to put across valid points, and argue your case, but when you write things that are patently untrue (and then fail to issue a reasonable comeback), people will assume it's because you have a chip on your shoulder.

A bit like Rebel Souls and his ongoing campaign against the BBC...eventually people will think "Ah ha...this man has one shoulder which is considerably lower than the other...for obvious reasons".

Unfair perhaps...but none-the-less...true.
"It's fine to put across valid points, and argue your case, but when you write things that are patently untrue (and then fail to issue a reasonable comeback), people will assume it's because you have a chip on your shoulder.

A bit like Rebel Souls and his ongoing campaign against the BBC...eventually people will think "Ah ha...this man has one shoulder which is considerably lower than the other...for obvious reasons"

So if something is posted that you dont like and or agree with you conclude that the person has a chip on thier shoulder...........Hmmmm....."Hello" , Mr Pot said to Mr Kettle, my youre looking very black today !

They should rename this the comedy section, by the way its nice and sunny today you can take those blinkers off.
bazwillrun

I was hoping that you'd prove your point:

"The riots were started by blacks, or do you deny that fact ? but that is convenientyl shoved aside to concentrate on all other sorts of figures and breakdown of the people involved in the following days of jump-on-the bandwagon chancers."

However, you have failed to do so, because you know that you've simply made it up.

Re: "So if something is posted that you dont like and or agree with you conclude that the person has a chip on thier shoulder"

Not at all...I had a long exchange with naomi24 where I vehemently disagreed with her position on what constitutes a racist insult. I could tell from what she wrote that she doesn't have a chip on her shoulder, nor does she play the race card.

You do.

And so does AOG...

Constantly.

61 to 80 of 89rss feed

First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

"We know what you are Anton Ferdinand, we know what you are"

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.