Has Boris Gone Crackers.

[teacake44]

I did say in one of my threads yesterday I though he had, but the new law, ( one of many) confirms such. If your caught being naughty with your next door neighbour, or someone outside your household in the bedroom, your in big trouble. Not to sure how their going to police this unless they have formed a sex squad to bash your bedroom door down and catch you in the act. Other than that may be it will be similar to the track and trace, so they will need a few more thousand volunteers. You will need to be home 24/7 and have experience of curtain peeping, your curtains must be of the blackout type, and the old net curtain for daytime peeping, should you not have either a voucher can be claimed for Dunelm.

Not sure who's come up with this one, but I can't see it being Boris with his track record, may be Cummings trying to spoil our pleasure time in retaliation. All these new laws are sending me dizzy :0) Boris get your head together and get real.

[woofgang]

bored now teacake

[Cryptical]

Get a life Teacake44.

[ABSpareEditor]

This is more of a political question than a law question, so I have moved it to the more appropriate category of Politics.

[LadyCG]

Get an education. The grammar in the OP is shocking.

You get a free education in this country and don't know the difference between their and they're, to and too and your and you're. Good God.

[teacake44]

11.59 I'm really good at counting. :0)

[dannyk13]

TC @11.59, do you mean counting for nothing?

[dannyk13]

^@ 12.02^

[teacake44]

12.04 Now your not very good at recognising figures :0) but I will forgive you. Now you've all had a good go at my awful, disgraceful grammar, can we get back to the thread, I have my music lesson at 1.00pm.

[Mozz71]

Has Teacake gone crackers is a better question.

The answer of course is "No" as they've always been a sandwich short of a (socially distant) picnic.

[teacake44]

Mozz, so glad you don't see me being crackers. May be the point I'm trying to make in a humorous way whenever possible is that there are far to many laws being written up on a daily basis, far to many to be even understood, or digested by the police who are left with the problem of sorting through such. The public are dizzy with the new laws also, no sooner they do get their heads round them, they are then dropped. Forget new laws, everyone knows what they need to do, its the government that don't.

[gulliver1]

"Has Boris Gone Crackers" ? Boris has always appeared to be a little odd . Think the ones who have gone "Crackers" are the ones that voted for him , and are now suffering the consequences.

[pixie374]

Who would have been better, gulliver? And what would they have done instead?

[iluvmargie]

I voted for him and have no regrets whatsoever.

[Bobbisox1]

Me too and long may he reign in number 10 and lead us to better times :0)

[gulliver1]

Mozz, 12.14, we all have our own opinions, I think if "Brains were Dynamite YOU couldn't blow your head off ".

[Atheist]

I find it most distasteful when ABers gang up to write rude comments about someone they don't agree with. Please attack the argument, not the man/woman.

[Gromit]

As has been obvious from the start of the Coronavirus pandemic, the Government hasn’t really thought through many of the rules they have introduced. Making it up as they go along seems to be the game plan.

Todays new amendment to The Health Protection (Coronavirus, Restrictions) Regulations 2020 bill does indeed make sex between people not living at the same address, illegal.
I am sure that is an error, and the ban wasn’t meant, but that is the what the new regs order. I doubt anyone will be prosecuted, and it is quite funny. But it does illustrate the sloppy and ill thought out way this Government operate. They’re a bit of a shambles, but we’ve known that for quite a while.

[pixie374]

Do you have an answer to my question, gulliver?

[gulliver1]

I see Sir Kier Starmers popularity is still rising in the Approval ratings, whilst Boris as expected, is now almost rock bottom. Oh dear.

[pixie374]

That's a no :-)