What Have The British Ever Done For...
Society & Culture1 min ago
Question Time
15 Answers
What a shambles. Anyone agree ?
Answers
1 to 15 of 15
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by whiskeryron. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I like the "sham" bit.
Why watch QT? Well research for your doctoral thesis on how free societies transition (have I got the back-formation right?) into tyrannies while preserving the illusions of liberty.
It's a propaganda effort, a gradual (though obviously not necessarily slow) process, like heating up the water one degree at a time to stop the frog jumping out of the pot before it's boiled.
QT is a sham debate. In the real world there's a spread of opinion, let's say A thru E, where A and E might be considered extreme. The QT "representative" panel has one A, three varieties of B and one C (very occasionally a D), is moderated by a B with an audience of As and Bs, usually no Cs or Ds, but one E for comic effect.
The pervasive repetition of this tendentious selective and editorial process, employed by all the main media, is imposing the view that the only intelligent and moral positions to be taken on issues like Brexit or mass immigration belong in the A and B camps, and that those who think differently (that's about half the population ) are "losers" to be pitied or "deplorables" to be despised.
Why watch QT? Well research for your doctoral thesis on how free societies transition (have I got the back-formation right?) into tyrannies while preserving the illusions of liberty.
It's a propaganda effort, a gradual (though obviously not necessarily slow) process, like heating up the water one degree at a time to stop the frog jumping out of the pot before it's boiled.
QT is a sham debate. In the real world there's a spread of opinion, let's say A thru E, where A and E might be considered extreme. The QT "representative" panel has one A, three varieties of B and one C (very occasionally a D), is moderated by a B with an audience of As and Bs, usually no Cs or Ds, but one E for comic effect.
The pervasive repetition of this tendentious selective and editorial process, employed by all the main media, is imposing the view that the only intelligent and moral positions to be taken on issues like Brexit or mass immigration belong in the A and B camps, and that those who think differently (that's about half the population ) are "losers" to be pitied or "deplorables" to be despised.
The Spectator is of course edited by Fraser Nelson.
Charles Moore is a Daily Telegraph columnist and biographer of Margaret Thatcher.
QT has always been awful. Anything that bad would have been cancelled years ago, but politicians like appearing on it, and the BBC are eager to please their paymasters.
Charles Moore is a Daily Telegraph columnist and biographer of Margaret Thatcher.
QT has always been awful. Anything that bad would have been cancelled years ago, but politicians like appearing on it, and the BBC are eager to please their paymasters.
In the Saturday Times Magazine of 30th June, Caitlin Moran wrote an excellent article on 'How to improve Question Time'. Briefly, her suggestions were:
1 Get rid of the audience
2 Get rid of the fifth chair with 'wild card' comedian or celebrity
3 Take fifth chair put it on the other side of the room behind a desk and have someone sit there fact-checking the claims made by the panellists. Judge Bullsh*t bangs a gong and shouts "INCORRECT! You have ten seconds to withdraw this falsehood- or it's the GUNGE TANK"
4 Oh yeah. There'd also be a gunge tank
1 Get rid of the audience
2 Get rid of the fifth chair with 'wild card' comedian or celebrity
3 Take fifth chair put it on the other side of the room behind a desk and have someone sit there fact-checking the claims made by the panellists. Judge Bullsh*t bangs a gong and shouts "INCORRECT! You have ten seconds to withdraw this falsehood- or it's the GUNGE TANK"
4 Oh yeah. There'd also be a gunge tank
1 to 15 of 15
