I Think This Is All Wrong

[cassa333]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-38891663

She made some unsound investment and he has to pay for that possibly for life.

If she were any good a beauty therapist she would be working 5 days a week.

[ummmm]

It's very wrong. She was an estate agent and beauty therapist. She should stand on her own two feet.

[Baldric]

That is so wrong, especially 15 years after Divorce.

[woofgang]

I suspect that. as usual, the paper hasn’t printed the whole story.

[Smowball]

I was in the car earlier and this was being debated on the radio. I do not understand why he has to keep paying anything when there are no children under 18. Just wrong! Hope he can appeal.

[jackthehat]

As it is reported it certainly seems unfair.
I wonder what parts of it haven't been reported and would explain it more fully?

[Bazile]

Might this have something to do with it ?

//...Frank Feehan, representing Mrs Mills, said she had been left with the responsibility for the couple's young child...//

[ummmm]

But he was already paying her and the child is over 18 now.

[Bazile]

OK - Dunno , then

On the face of it - it does seem very unfair .

I thought that divorce settlements could not be re-visited unless there were extremely good reasons - like one partner had concealed assets at the time - for example

[AB Editor]

It does seem like something is missing from the report, otherwise it is madness.

[Lie-in King]

If the report is in full & accurate then it's completely wrong & unfair.

[marval]

It seems very unfair, unless there is something going on we don't know about.

[yogi-bear]

This is not right, if full story printed here, and more to the point, doesn't it set a precedent for others in the same circumstances, to try their luck and claim more?

Just not fair, in my opinion.

[Baldric]

Not even our favourite Paper offers anything new ...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4195940/Graham-Mills-told-ex-wife-s-money-spent-it.html

[Bazile]

yogi-bear - I agree , if this is all to the story , then this would set a ridiculous precedent .

''Oh dear i've spent all my divorce settlement - what shall i do ?
Oh i know - my ex partner is doing well - i'm sure he/she would like to contribute some more ''

No - there must be more to this story
If there isn't then i cannot see how the appeal court judges have come to this decision

[ummmm]

I'm sure I've heard a similar story before.

It could be keeping her the lifestyle she'd become accustomed to.

[youngmafbog]

I think I saw something about he didnt sign some papaer or other.

Even so on the face of it this seems rediculous, though not unexpected of our liberal left judiciuary. He should appeal and keep appealing until he has no money just to spite the old bag.