Donate SIGN UP

Indemnity vs Liability

Avatar Image
LindaPenang | 18:23 Wed 03rd Dec 2008 | Law
3 Answers
What is the difference between an indemnity for breach of contract and a liability for breach of contract?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by LindaPenang. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
It means that the party who is liable for the breach indemnifies (i.e. compensates) the innocent party.
????????
Indemnity for breach = provides a commitment to compensate in the event that such a breach occured. The indemnity could be in the form of a commitment by a third-party, an insurer, say.
liability for breach = the exposure (sometimess expressed in money terms within the contract, sometimes determined by the courts in the event of a proven legal case) that one party (to a contract) has to another party in the event that it did breach the contract.
Ah, so what you're saying, buildersmate, is that the party who suffers a breach of contract can be indemnified (i.e. compensated) by the other party who is liable for the breach (perhaps via a third party) who is responsible for the breach?

Actually, isn't that pretty much what I wrote - albeit more concisely? Sorry to steal your thunder.

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Indemnity vs Liability

Answer Question >>