Donate SIGN UP

erm not sure what to put as a title child porn?

Avatar Image
elerrina | 00:12 Wed 17th Jan 2007 | Law
7 Answers
ok my mate has done a really stupid thing, he had all these pis of his ex girlfriend naked and stuff and he emailed them out without thinking and shes under the age of 16 and hes over 16 could he get done for possesion and distribution of child pornography? thanks
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by elerrina. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
yes he can any one under the age of 18 you can get done for
lets hope so!

he's obviously a complete arse !
Question Author
actually hes not an arse hes rele nice the girl who h was emailin stuff round of was a real cow to him and treated him like crap but thats not the point lol
Just to elaborate on SleepyJ's answer:

Where the subject of a photograph is aged 16 or 17, the law is not as restrictive as when the subject is under 16. (So photography of simple nudity might not automatically count as an offence). However, when the person pictured is under 16 years of age (and the pictures are not, say, just innocent images, taken by a parent, of a toddler in the bath) then possession and distribution of images of nudity almost certainly constitutes a breach of the Sexual Offences Act 2003.

Illegal images are grouped, by case law (R v Oliver), into five categories. Simple nudity is at 'level 1' but, if the images are posed, this could take them into 'level 2'. If there is any sexual content to the photos (e.g. concentration on genitalia), this could cause the images to fall into level 3'. (Levels 4 and 5 are used for penetrative sexual acts and masochism).

If the police were to get involved, the first problem your friend might experience would simply be the hassle of having his home searched and his computer taken away for many months. (The last time I saw a press reference to current processing times, it was suggested that the police take about 9 months to examine a suspect's computer). If charges were to follow, a conviction for level 1 offences would probably be unlikely to result in a custodial sentence. (It couldn't be completely ruled out. This is because of the 'distribution' of the pictures). However, if the photographs were at level 2 or 3, the possibility of a custodial sentence increases. Either way, your friend would be placed on the sex offenders register and have to notify any changes of address, or holiday plans, to the police for several years. He would also be barred from some types of employment for life.

Chris
Question Author
thanks Buenchico thats extremely helpful info
Let's not forget the Malicious Communications Act 1998.
Hope he's locked up. Even if she shagged his brother what he did is repulsive.

1 to 7 of 7rss feed

Do you know the answer?

erm not sure what to put as a title child porn?

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.