News1 min ago
Gary McKinnon
Just heard on TV news that Alan Johnson has declined to allow G McKinnon's appeal against extradition to US of A on computer hacking charges.
I think this is the correct decision. What do you all think?
I think this is the correct decision. What do you all think?
Answers
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by scotman. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.He is probably guilty, so let the Americans sentence him to 10 years. Extradite him here after 18 months, and let him out 18 months after that.
Everyone's happy, the US have had their show trial, we get our man back pretty soon and the idiot might be taught a lesson not to do anything so stupid again.
Everyone's happy, the US have had their show trial, we get our man back pretty soon and the idiot might be taught a lesson not to do anything so stupid again.
-- answer removed --
Gromit – I too cannot believe your callousness in this case. This question has come up before and neither you or anyone else responded to my answer. Therefore, I shall repeat it verbatim:
“… However, there are a couple of reasons that – in this particular instance – I believe he [Gary McKinnon] should be tried over here.
First, the sentence that he would receive in the US (if he's found guilty) is likely to be 60 years. As he's already 43, this means that he will die in prison. So in effect, he could receive a life sentence.
Secondly, statements have been made by some US officials saying that they want to see him “fry” (!). This hardly suggests that he's going to receive a fair trial.
Thirdly, we have a policy in this country that rejects extradition to countries where the accused is likely to face a punishment that is grossly disproportionate to the crime or where the person in question may receive a capital punishment (see “fry” above).
I think the real reason that some US officials want to see Gary tried in their country is that he has made some very powerful people look very stupid indeed. This is not about US justice, it's about US revenge. I'm sure no one will disagree that the USA have a highly dubious record when it comes to human rights (Guantanamo Bay?) and for this reason and the other reasons above, I believe Gary McKinnon should be tried in the UK.”
“… However, there are a couple of reasons that – in this particular instance – I believe he [Gary McKinnon] should be tried over here.
First, the sentence that he would receive in the US (if he's found guilty) is likely to be 60 years. As he's already 43, this means that he will die in prison. So in effect, he could receive a life sentence.
Secondly, statements have been made by some US officials saying that they want to see him “fry” (!). This hardly suggests that he's going to receive a fair trial.
Thirdly, we have a policy in this country that rejects extradition to countries where the accused is likely to face a punishment that is grossly disproportionate to the crime or where the person in question may receive a capital punishment (see “fry” above).
I think the real reason that some US officials want to see Gary tried in their country is that he has made some very powerful people look very stupid indeed. This is not about US justice, it's about US revenge. I'm sure no one will disagree that the USA have a highly dubious record when it comes to human rights (Guantanamo Bay?) and for this reason and the other reasons above, I believe Gary McKinnon should be tried in the UK.”
Gromit -
“... so let the Americans sentence him to 10 years. Extradite him here after 18 months, and let him out 18 months after that”
Being (as you so obviously are) conversant with the intimate workings of the the American legal system and international prisoner transfer protocols, please can you explain how your above scenario will become a reality?
Or is this just whimsy on your part?
“... so let the Americans sentence him to 10 years. Extradite him here after 18 months, and let him out 18 months after that”
Being (as you so obviously are) conversant with the intimate workings of the the American legal system and international prisoner transfer protocols, please can you explain how your above scenario will become a reality?
Or is this just whimsy on your part?
Justice will only be served if he stands trial in the US, otherwise it will be some kind of fob off as we normally get in the UK. Unfortunately you do the crime you must responsible for your actions. Any issues, such as Autism, that he suffers from will be taken into account. How disabled is he? Is his dis order one which would preclude him standing trial?? I don't know if any of you have tried hacking into a computer system, it takes a keen brain and a huge amount of ability to break the simplest of codes and firewalls. I don't think he's as innocent as many make out he has to stand in the US
Gromit,do you have any understanding whatsoever of Asperger Syndrome? Calling Gary McKinnon an idiot is ridiculous, he is obviously far from that as he managed to get past some of the best computer security in the world with no help from anyone else. However, this doesn't mean he had any idea of the consequences of his actions. Hacking into the systems was not a malicious act, it was not an act of terrorism, he didn't intend to cause any damage or sell any information he found to a third party or organisation.
Slapshot,you also obviously have no idea about Asperger Syndrome,having the condition does not mean you are 'thick'. Have you see the film Rain Man? have you heard the term 'Savant'? Try educating yourself before making comments like this:
"I don't know if any of you have tried hacking into a computer system, it takes a keen brain and a huge amount of ability to break the simplest of codes and firewalls. I don't think he's as innocent as many make out he has to stand in the US"
Slapshot,you also obviously have no idea about Asperger Syndrome,having the condition does not mean you are 'thick'. Have you see the film Rain Man? have you heard the term 'Savant'? Try educating yourself before making comments like this:
"I don't know if any of you have tried hacking into a computer system, it takes a keen brain and a huge amount of ability to break the simplest of codes and firewalls. I don't think he's as innocent as many make out he has to stand in the US"
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
-- answer removed --
Sorry if I'm tetchy I've spent the last 15 years of my professional life fighting computer criminals and I don't like to see sympathy going to them and people playing it down as an offense.
He committed what is a crime in the US and the UK - the offense was in America - he has admitted it
If he has mitigating circumstances they should be heard in the US
This is not Liberia he's being extradited to the US has a proper judicial system
It's pretty open and shut case
He committed what is a crime in the US and the UK - the offense was in America - he has admitted it
If he has mitigating circumstances they should be heard in the US
This is not Liberia he's being extradited to the US has a proper judicial system
It's pretty open and shut case