Has Archie Had His Eyebrows Drawn On?

[ladybirder]

It looks to me as if someone (Meghan) has drawn a set of eyebrows above his own real ones which is a shame and does him no favours.
Or is it just me being miserable? The second picture down shows more what I mean.
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2019122481854/meghan-markle-prince-harry-archie-christmas-card-2019/

[MWG14]

Your imagination, I think!

[emmie]

i don't think they are drawn on as such.
you can be miserable if you want, it's allowed
after such major surgery. I hope your medication
kicks in soon and make you feel a little better

[pastafreak]

I imagine it's a screenshot of the ecard they sent, so it will lack detail. No...I don't think anything has been drawn on. And why suggest Meghan?

[Bobbisox1]

Maybe a baby crease as he raises his head to the camera

[ladybirder]

Must be just me then. I noticed as soon as I saw it and in close up it becomes even clearer, to me. Pasta, because I can't imagine anyone but a mother doing it and I wouldn't think anyone else would dare.
Emma thanks, I'll feel better soon I hope, I've just slipped in an extra pill:-)

[Mamyalynne]

The lower line is the edge of the eye socket giving that effect.

Clearer here.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-7824455/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-dress-little-cub-Archie-jumper-British-brand.html

[237SJ]

The pictures in the mail online look really odd - Meghans face has been photoshopped.

[ladybirder]

Gosh a lot clearer thank you. I can see one eyebrow above the other clearly on the r/h side of the picture, more so than the left. In fact the bottom one is far less prominent than the top (drawn on) one. The bottom one looks natural, the top one is much too shapely for a baby and looks like the drawn on eyebrows seen on celebs in the papers every day IMO and only MO it seems.

[Prudie]

Personally I think Archie has been added on after as well - but I'd probably do the same to get a good card (if I did that kind of card.....)

[Cloverjo]

I agree, 237sj. M and H are sitting the same distance from the camera, but H’s face is slightly blurred while M’s is in sharp focus.
Anyway, their card - they can do what they like with the pics.

[237SJ]

I think the card was probably authentic - it appeared on an unverified twitter a/c for the commonwealth trust and a spokeswoman has said it is authentic (according to Sky) but my guess is whoever has then reposted it on various media has messed about with it a bit. The more you look at it, the more faults can be seen (the writing has been overwritten as well) Probably someone trying to enhance the picture before posting.

[anneasquith]

Something odd about that photograph. Whoever
.? Doctored it, they didn’t make a very good job of it. Some interesting viewpoints in the mail online .

[hellywelly4]

I’m afraid I don’t think it’s a very good photo at all. Makes him look a bit odd.

[AuntPollyGrey]

He looks chinese

[AuntPollyGrey]

seriously I think this is a fake photo -that baby has an Epicanthic fold

[Peter Pedant]

yeah they have drawn in epicanthic folds as well

(kid looks a bit siamese if you please in technical terms)

[Peter Pedant]

hmm perhaps the father - -- isnt the father
well readers it has happened before !

[pastafreak]

Some have said he has strabismus, hence the odd looking eyes.
I had strabismus, and my eye(s) looked fine...

[AuntPollyGrey]

Its not his eyes its his eyelids. Deffo think this is NOT a photo of little Archie.

[woofgang]

I have no idea what you guys are on but probabaly best if you don't drive tonight