Donate SIGN UP
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by tonyav. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So sad, we've all met them but so much worse when they have celebrity status but not for the victims
-- answer removed --
I found it hard to believe that the charges against him were justified - until images of children were discovered on his computer. There is no defence against that.
Naomi , he admitted at least one case, the daughter of a close friend who he abused over several years.
but it is subject to legislation, methyl
-- answer removed --
Why Methyl?
Methyl, I take it you do not believe Harris was guilty?
Eddie, I don't doubt it now. I think most of us find it difficult to believe that a 'National Treasure' is not such a treasure - until the evidence is such that we have no alternative.
the Protection of Children Act is legislation. They're not just inventing offences, there actually are laws against this sort of thing.

I agree with naomi, it is sad to see; but clearly the nice-guy image he had (unlike Savile, who appeared to revel in being odd) was simply inaccurate, and we had no reason to suspect it.
Her should have had his Kangaroo tied down when he was a teenage.

Hans.

Methyl Proof? proof of what? Harris was found guilty by a jury after a fair trial, I call that proof.
Money grabbing? Where in the article does it mention money?

1 to 13 of 13rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Rolf Harris

Answer Question >>