If you cant find £40 perhaps you shouldn't be having a baby. There will be a lot more extra costs to come. Third baby at 22 on benefits is far more worrying than who should foot the bill (which the mother should IMO).
If she had been in the ambulance she wouldn't have had to pay though, so maybe we need to know why she was in a taxi. If the hospital said she had to use a taxi as there was no ambulance available then I can see the NHS should pay
I agree ummmm. We all have to juggle our finances at times. I sometimes don't get paid for work until several weeks later and occasionally much longer, and last time I went on JSA it took 2 months for them to approve my claim, so I had to use savings, juggle bills, cut back etc until the money came through.
I was born in a wheelchair, I was born 20 minutes after my mum went into labour.. My cousin gave birth to her first child in a car (a Civic, her middle name is Vicci) Her next child was born in her bathroom. We seem to have quick labours...
Taxi companies don't really need good PR do they? Surely nobody really considers which taxi company they use; I just go with whatever number I know / can find. And as the drivers are self employed (I think) they are making decisions on their own needs not the business needs.
Yes she should pay - chalk it up to one of the many cost of having children
My mam took herself to hospital in a taxi as she wasn't feeling well as she arrived there she had a heart attack and died, the taxi driver still asked my dad for the fare!