Donate SIGN UP

Star Wars films were better before CGI - Discuss!

Avatar Image
Fizzgig | 00:57 Sat 28th Jan 2006 | Film, Media & TV
6 Answers

Are my husband and I alone in thinking that the first three Star Wars films made, (episodes 4,5 & 6) were heaps better than the new CGI'd up to their eyeballs episodes 1, 2 and 3? I for one think that if objects in a film are made from things you can actually reach out and touch, it makes them seem all the more real. (And ladies, wouldn't we all like to touch Han Solo?)

Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Fizzgig. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I wholeheartedly agree with you on the CGI issue. The fact that hundreds of hours went into building models of X-Wings, TIE Fighters, Star Destroyers, etc. gives the whole thing a lot more charm.
With CGI techniques, it's possible to achieve physics and effects not possible with models, but I think you sacrifice a sense of realism.

Having said all of that, the most recent remastered (and remastered again for good measure) DVD edition strikes a perfect balance between CGI and models. For more complex shots and effects, CGI techniques were used, yet 90% of all ships, etc. were physically built models, which really worked for me.
Question Author
I was a child of the 70's so Star Wars: A New Hope is very close to my heart. I've seen it so many times I know the entire script blah blah blah. I'm not against CGI as a technology because it has brought alot of magic to films, but I think with the last three chapters, their charm is in their naivity. Now I would love them to re-release the films, pre-remastering on DVD but it looks as though I'll have to join the 21st century!!
i have to say that myself and my brother spent many an hour playing out star wars in our youth - and i couldnt envisgae it any other way than me being princess leah and him being luke - it just wouldnt be the same - especiallly if my bro was to become jar jar binks over night - OMG what wud the world come to 8-) hehehe

I always stand by my argument that the "prequals" to the orignal trilogy should have had worse graphics!


As the movies where set before the orginal trilogy, yoda should have been a sock puppet, the X-wings made from cardboard, c3po made from fairy liquid bottles, and so on.

you have to remember that we were all kids when the original 3 were released and are now adults so the newest 3 were never going to live up to our expectations that have been building for so many years.


You are so right Mattk.


As "good" as the first 3 were, Yoda was a flippin muppet! He actally looks life-like in 1, 2 & 3.


The real trouble is now that you have grown up you realise that the dialogue is utter garbage!


Never mind CGI, Hayden looks like he is made out of wood!

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Star Wars films were better before CGI - Discuss!

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.