Donate SIGN UP

Sex Offender Granted Anonymity By The Courts...

Avatar Image
sandyRoe | 20:15 Fri 25th Jan 2013 | ChatterBank
6 Answers
His lawyers claim that if he was named he might self-harm. Isn't it a pity he never thought of the consequences of his actions before he harmed his victims?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-21199386
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by sandyRoe. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
So wrong.

How many other sex offenders will now claim that they will do themselves an injury if they are named?

Surely the public have a right to know the name of this monster?
-- answer removed --
Question Author
It's ironic that the decision came on the same day that this man was sentenced to 8 years imprisonment for offences against children.
Tweed had tried unsuccessfully to keep reports of a previous trail from being published. The fact that it was publicised prompted the victims to come forward and secure the conviction.
Question Author
Very wrong not to name him. There are perverts within families who have kept these sort of things quiet. Name and shame every time I say.
It smacks of the law looking after the criminals and not the victims.

Disgusting.

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Sex Offender Granted Anonymity By The Courts...

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.