Donate SIGN UP

Stargazing live........

Avatar Image
d9f1c7 | 16:38 Wed 18th Jan 2012 | Film, Media & TV
39 Answers
I must say I was totally impressed last night when professor Cox explained the fluttering flag on the moon (yawn) when he followed it up with the correct and rather brutal, "if you still think they didn't go to the moon, stop watching now, we don't want you". Got me wondering, are there still people out there who think the moon landings were faked? Are there any abers? what are your reasons?
Gravatar

Answers

21 to 39 of 39rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by d9f1c7. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
The conditions in the LHC are created continuously in the upper atmosphere. Black holes are created and dissipated in nano seconds, due to hawking radiation. The LHC is necessary because the detectors cannot be placed in the upper atmosphere.
Fantastic programme and thoroughly enjoy the input of both presenters but am finding Dara constantly cutting across Brian mid sentence a mite tedious.
Micheal Stipe ????
Philtaz just like he did before, as to jonathan ross, what are the programme makers thinking
it should be good tonight, some town in devon switching off all the lights in town for a better view.
Ankou, that's if one of the presenters can persuade them all, a tall order, hope they do it.
the mayor was on radio4 this morning, they're all up for it apparently, street lights an'all.
I will never forget the night in July 1969 we hadn't been married long - we set our alarm clocks to get up in the middle of the night (was it about 3am?) it was so exciting to see it all on our black and white TV at the time, them actually landing on the moon and take the first steps with the iconic words, quite awe inspiring. We've never doubted it.
fantastic, if dara can keep his gob shut for 10 seconds, lawd bless him, then i will definitely be watching.
Re. The younger presenter thing, Dara is younger than Brian, born 1972 as opposed to 1968.
i saw a programme years ago that did a close up of a bit of rock from moom footage and it had writing on, only saw that bit-was probably channel hopping, they said that proves it was fake, but how do we know the bit they showed wasn't faked? I think there will always be doubters...
i think that was just a bit of fluff or summink on the lens.

http://www.conspiracy...-camera-problems.html
but brian cox doesn't keep talking over his co presenter, he may be younger but looks ten years older.
Mythbusters did a really interesting programme about the moon landings. very interesting stuff and dismisses most of if not all of the theories.
I must admit Dara gets on my nerves with his butting in. I think he takes the subject off track at times. Brian Cox would be better as the sole presenter.
naomi, thank you, i have watched dara and brian before, and then as now wished dara would just disappear, he is a distraction, and too talkative for his own good.
Dulverton, they are switching off all the lights at 815 tonight (on the programme)
that was a bit disappointing really. good on them for trying, but why waste my viewing time asking some old duffers all about the towns lighting... 'what does it mean to you' etc etc ..... zzzz.
I agree with em10. I think Brian Cox is brilliant and although I have never had an interest in science, I understood most of what he said. Unfortunately, I didn't watch all of the programme on the second night because Dara was getting on my nerves when he kept butting in and I think he was totally superfluous to the programme.

21 to 39 of 39rss feed

First Previous 1 2

Do you know the answer?

Stargazing live........

Answer Question >>