Donate SIGN UP

Refuse entry for security reasons.

Avatar Image
anotheoldgit | 16:45 Mon 27th Jun 2011 | News
130 Answers
http://www.dailymail....-travel-agencies.html

In view of this and other such incidents, plus the calls for a nation wide ban on the burka falling on deaf ears, I wonder if for security reasons it would be lawful for banks, shops, travel agents etc to ban anyone wearing a burka from entering their premises?
Gravatar

Answers

121 to 130 of 130rss feed

First Previous 4 5 6 7

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by anotheoldgit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Try saying it in Tower Hamlets, and many other areas in the capital, say it to the local press, national press, see how far you get, a number of people in the National press have been harangued for airing their views on the subject, and they have loudly and publicly denounced as being racist, or as someone put it on this site, about one journalist, she is a zionist and is full of hate, not quite verbatim but almost. We all have our views, and this one has run its course.
"i don't think so"

It is so plainly exaggerated and extreme, it can't not be in jest. If it isn't, then it just looks silly. So no threat to your liberty either way.

"number of people in the National press have been harangued for airing their views on the subject"

Firstly, you are exaggerating considerably the number that have been called racist. Secondly, the fact that they were attacked is called 'being challenged'. Lots of ABers seem to mistake it for persecution. If people think these journalists are racists, then they can say so - and if they're not racists, then these people will look ridiculous and will have undermined themselves. None of these journalists as far as I can remember have been made to recant their views against their will or have been forcibly silenced - that would be persecution.

"We all have our views, and this one has run its course. "

If you want to capitulate, then frankly that's your problem - don't blame the people arguing with you.
just concluded what i had to say, no more to add, thats all
Kromovaracun >>If it isn't, then it just looks silly.<<

you said it kromovaracum it is just like the ones who say edl bnp etc are skinhead knuckle draggers

some people don't like you having a different point of view


>> So no threat to your liberty either way. <<

does not effect me in anyway live and let live sunshine
"
does not effect me in anyway live and let live sunshine"

Then why are you complaining if you don't disagree that people with right wing views are not being persecuted in the way they seem to think they are?

"it is just like the ones who say edl bnp etc are skinhead knuckle draggers "

Personally, I don't think they look that silly...
Kromovaracun

>>Then why are you complaining <<

please show me one of my complaints on this thread

just asked a question and making a few remarks
Question Author
>> I wonder if for security reasons it would be lawful for banks, shops, travel agents etc to ban anyone wearing a burka from entering their premises? <<

Nobody has answered yet Doc.
-- answer removed --
"please show me one of my complaints on this thread"

Complaining was probably the wrong word - you're right, you haven't complained anywhere.

But I think you do come across as having some sympathy with the idea that you're 'not allowed' to disagree with liberals. Which for the reasons outlined previously, I think is extremely mistaken.
some people will not allow you to disagree with anyone

121 to 130 of 130rss feed

First Previous 4 5 6 7

Do you know the answer?

Refuse entry for security reasons.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.