Crosswords1 min ago
WHAT OTHER COUNTRY WOULD ALLOW THIS TO HAPPEN ??
Answers
1 to 13 of 13
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by chas2008. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Well most other countries actually
Do you have any idea how many illegal immigrants there are in the US and yet they have a small army trying to keep borders tight.
Oh yes you say - but this was Heathrow!
But didn't the Americans arrest the failed Times square bomber only as he was actually boarding a plane minutes from take-off?
The fact of the matter is that modern developed nations have huge flows of people 70,000 people a day at heathrow alone.
Policing that is a major undertaking that challenges every country - despite what the Mule would have you believe
Do you have any idea how many illegal immigrants there are in the US and yet they have a small army trying to keep borders tight.
Oh yes you say - but this was Heathrow!
But didn't the Americans arrest the failed Times square bomber only as he was actually boarding a plane minutes from take-off?
The fact of the matter is that modern developed nations have huge flows of people 70,000 people a day at heathrow alone.
Policing that is a major undertaking that challenges every country - despite what the Mule would have you believe
Actually this reminds me of one of the most brain dead things I heard in the campaign.
UKIP's Nigel Farage " This Government doesn't even know how may illegal immigrants there are in the UK"
- er yes Nigel - there's probably a good reason for that
Perhaps we should have an illegal immigrant register and get them all to sign in!
UKIP's Nigel Farage " This Government doesn't even know how may illegal immigrants there are in the UK"
- er yes Nigel - there's probably a good reason for that
Perhaps we should have an illegal immigrant register and get them all to sign in!
Amazing, absolutely amazing,
No criticism regarding her buying a three-month-old baby in Nigeria for £150, so as to get a council house.
No criticism regarding her illegally entering the country so as to sue her former employers, the Peabody Trust for race and sex discrimination, for refusing to install a kitchen or toilet in her office.
No criticism regarding the employment tribunal allowing the case to proceed knowing she was in the country illegally.
No wonder this country is a soft touch.
No criticism regarding her buying a three-month-old baby in Nigeria for £150, so as to get a council house.
No criticism regarding her illegally entering the country so as to sue her former employers, the Peabody Trust for race and sex discrimination, for refusing to install a kitchen or toilet in her office.
No criticism regarding the employment tribunal allowing the case to proceed knowing she was in the country illegally.
No wonder this country is a soft touch.
This is not just a Daily Mail 'sensationalised' report.
Even the Guardian beat the Daily Mail by 'sensationalising' the concerns in the increase in child trafficking.
http://www.guardian.c...cservices.immigration
/// Senior detectives fear that "thousands" of children are being smuggled into Britain for benefit fraud, and privately admit that trafficking legislation is not working.///
Still not concerned, or are these extra thousands of children, all for the good of the country in some Lefftie's warped way of thinking?
Even the Guardian beat the Daily Mail by 'sensationalising' the concerns in the increase in child trafficking.
http://www.guardian.c...cservices.immigration
/// Senior detectives fear that "thousands" of children are being smuggled into Britain for benefit fraud, and privately admit that trafficking legislation is not working.///
Still not concerned, or are these extra thousands of children, all for the good of the country in some Lefftie's warped way of thinking?
That's it Oldgit you tell them - tell everyone of them, keep that finger directly pointed. I totally agree with everything you have said in your above post. (This post is not to be construed in any other way, I am actually serious.....and don't forget to add that we now have a new government and we should support it - for the time being at least).
/// We now have a new government and we should support it - for the time being at least. ///
Absolutely seadragon I totally agree.
I maintain in the present difficulties this country now finds itself in, we can do no better than to have a coalition government.
It is only a pity that it could not have included all 3 major parties, we could have then enjoyed the best of the lot.
The only problem is the fact that although the media was intent on getting rid of Brown and his New Labour, it will not rest now until it has broken up the alliance between the Tories and Lib/Dems.
Give them a chance I say, until at least they make a muck-up of it themselves.
Absolutely seadragon I totally agree.
I maintain in the present difficulties this country now finds itself in, we can do no better than to have a coalition government.
It is only a pity that it could not have included all 3 major parties, we could have then enjoyed the best of the lot.
The only problem is the fact that although the media was intent on getting rid of Brown and his New Labour, it will not rest now until it has broken up the alliance between the Tories and Lib/Dems.
Give them a chance I say, until at least they make a muck-up of it themselves.
-- answer removed --
1 to 13 of 13
