Crosswords0 min ago
Cameron's Nooo Tories.
David cameron is desperately going around apologising for previous Thatcher's and Major's past policies.
Today, he is apologising to homosexuals and says they were wrong about section 28.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-119692 4/Cameron-apologises-gays-Section-28-Maggies-l aw-ban-promotion-homosexuality-schools-wrong-s ays-Tory-leader.html
The other day he says they were wrong about Scottish devolution.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8122065 .stm
I would be interested to hear what Tories think about these statements?
Are the Tories moving too near to Labour, just to get elected?
Today, he is apologising to homosexuals and says they were wrong about section 28.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-119692 4/Cameron-apologises-gays-Section-28-Maggies-l aw-ban-promotion-homosexuality-schools-wrong-s ays-Tory-leader.html
The other day he says they were wrong about Scottish devolution.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/8122065 .stm
I would be interested to hear what Tories think about these statements?
Are the Tories moving too near to Labour, just to get elected?
Answers
1 to 19 of 19
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Gromit. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
well the section 28 issue was largeley misrepresented. It was designed to stop teachers peddling gay propganda but in reality they tried to say it stopped them dealing with bullying issues, total b0ll0x. Still didn't stop the labour party using the Parliament act twice to help their Gay buddies.
As far as devolution goes I'd say they were right to oppose it, why create a whole new batch of snout in trough politicians with very little power? But hey it's of sod all importance as none of us are independent anyway.
Anyway, on the wider issue Gromit I'd say that Labour first had to become psuedo Tory to get elected so really they are pretty much identical, except for a few minor issues like the section 28 stuff etc so I'd say no!
As far as devolution goes I'd say they were right to oppose it, why create a whole new batch of snout in trough politicians with very little power? But hey it's of sod all importance as none of us are independent anyway.
Anyway, on the wider issue Gromit I'd say that Labour first had to become psuedo Tory to get elected so really they are pretty much identical, except for a few minor issues like the section 28 stuff etc so I'd say no!
Scare mongering stories that highlighted a few gay radicals dishing out gay propaganda should not lead a Government to introduce laws that hinder sensible communication with a significant minority section of society. I'm glad Cameron has seen its error.
As for Devolution, the Tories were completely out of step with the mindset of an entire region of the UK, which is surely more embarrassing politically than the section 28 debacle.
As for Devolution, the Tories were completely out of step with the mindset of an entire region of the UK, which is surely more embarrassing politically than the section 28 debacle.
Clause 28 was a load of nonsense.
No prosecutions, and a miniscule amount of money spent on books like Terry's Got Two Dads.
A huge misfire on the part of the Tories at the time. It effectively galvanized gays against them very vocally, and for zero political gain.
Not as dim as the Poll Tax, but certainly up there.
No prosecutions, and a miniscule amount of money spent on books like Terry's Got Two Dads.
A huge misfire on the part of the Tories at the time. It effectively galvanized gays against them very vocally, and for zero political gain.
Not as dim as the Poll Tax, but certainly up there.
Yep sqad is correct, the opposition do not win elections, governments lose them. Usually because of an overriding desire for a change. Do not look for rhymme or reason with the public where half of them are thick as pig sh1t and half of them are dimmer than that, they are more interested in brain numbing soaps on the roger Mellie. So Jake, Gromit and co get used to a couple of terms of the Tories. Cameron cannot avoid winning now but he's just playing to his own insecurities. Sucking up to the right on trendy issues as he sees them is just part of that. I just hope he ain't gonna introduce hug a Bandit week or something!
A couple of Terms Geezer?
Wow you really do have a low opinion of the elctorate don't you?
A year or so of cutting public services due to what they will call the "dreadful state they inherited" whilst simultaneously cutting inheritance tax for millionaires and private schools and I think people will remember why they were booted out
Wow you really do have a low opinion of the elctorate don't you?
A year or so of cutting public services due to what they will call the "dreadful state they inherited" whilst simultaneously cutting inheritance tax for millionaires and private schools and I think people will remember why they were booted out
well jake I suppose I also have a low opinion of he system when some snotty, who is cluless can vote and cancel out your vote for example, there is something wrong. I don't know what the answer is but there has to be a better way. Anyway doesn't matter who you vote for the governement always gets in!
When I was young, it was a CRIMINAL OFFENCE to be involved in homosexual practices. Now we have prediction of a homosexual Prime Minister. Don't we actually have a homosexual prime minister-in-waiting? Mandelson seems to be running the country by proxy - even after having been thrown out of TWO previous cabinets for dodgy dealings.
It's time that we got rid of ALL the dodgy dealers out of government posts - even that slimeball Cash has wheedled his way back into favour. Anyone else would have been jailed.
AND....We want our word GAY back. It was a lovely word descriptive of childhood delights. Now it just means perverted and refers to people who should be kept under lock and key, as in the last century.
It's time that we got rid of ALL the dodgy dealers out of government posts - even that slimeball Cash has wheedled his way back into favour. Anyone else would have been jailed.
AND....We want our word GAY back. It was a lovely word descriptive of childhood delights. Now it just means perverted and refers to people who should be kept under lock and key, as in the last century.
I'm old enough to remember people being jailed for homosexual activities and actually worked in the same office as one who was jailed. Good riddance to him.
Then it became legal. A total mistake
Then it became highly fashionable. Celebrity idiocy.
Now it is getting very powerful. Beware.
Cameron and Brown seem hell bent on making it compulsory. Come to think of it Brown is a metaphor for homosexuality.
Then it became legal. A total mistake
Then it became highly fashionable. Celebrity idiocy.
Now it is getting very powerful. Beware.
Cameron and Brown seem hell bent on making it compulsory. Come to think of it Brown is a metaphor for homosexuality.
1 to 19 of 19
Related Questions
Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.