Donate SIGN UP

no more characters left?

Avatar Image
Sgt.Rock | 14:19 Thu 30th Oct 2008 | ChatterBank
97 Answers
Has the Ed's over the top purge led to all the people with any real views and character (like them or not) being removed from the answerbank?

Gravatar

Answers

81 to 97 of 97rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Sgt.Rock. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
By an extraordinary coincidence I happen to know whiffey in real life and he doesn't have a top-of-the-range Lotus, it's just a hotted-up Exige. His dad has the top-of-the-range model.

He asked me to give you a message - BUM.
is that your surname gormless..... BUM




::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
No, whatever made you think that? People simply do not send messages that are their surname, it makes no sense.

Now that would be a good user name for you makesnosence and it has exactly 12 letters wow coincidence Eh
some people put their name at the end of a message



::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Potentially a good idea sir.knobby, but unfortunately the speling is all wrong, which therefore makes it a stupid idea.

Always glad to help
See that you are out of hibernation on food and drink now 3 f's
:0
there is no set rule on how to spell a username
ie, you could spell
Gormless
goormless
goormles
gormeles, etc, etc




::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Doc stop giving whiffey ideas will you
Or even gorrrrrrmless. Sounding a bit worzel-ish, know whatta mean?
sorry sir



::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Sorry DrFilth, no you can't just take a word and spell it any old way you like.

I mean, what if I said, my darling I think you are "odious" when I should have said "wonderful". Just one example, there are millions of others.

http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=DQKGHdfPU4I



:::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
you can with names
you could be mr and mrs odious, odioous, odiouus , etc



::::::::::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::







ta toot ta toot ta tooot
I think what the real problem here is that when the new ed took over a few folks were probably rubbing their hands together in glee thinking that there was going to be a few usernames getting instantly banned.

That wouldn't have been right nor fair.

The way i see it is the ed has started over with a clean slate. He's not going to remove someone simply because he's had umpteen emails from people saying this person or that one said this or called me that in the past.

It's the here and now that counts.

well said Jafi



:::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

81 to 97 of 97rss feed

First Previous 2 3 4 5

Do you know the answer?

no more characters left?

Answer Question >>