Hold on a gosh darn minute.

[flobadob]

Naomi24 posted a Q the other day about the church now accepting Darwin's theory of evolution. Does this mean that they now are admitting that parts of the bible are obviously completely made up? And if so how are people supposed to distinguish which parts are real and which are not supposed to be taken seriously?

Am I the only one who thinks that the bible is due another re-write, and perhaps from now on it should stop being portrayed as any way factual and more as a reference guide.

I mean, come on, does anyone care about this?

Here's the link again which was originally found by naomi24 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/rel igion/2958018/Church-to-make-posthumous-apolog y-to-Charles-Darwin.html

[naomi24]

If they do, then they have some very odd, and some very inhumane ideas.

[Octavius]

Yes, criticised for following all or some of it.
It�s a sorry existence this persecution.

[cassa333]

Ok sorry, even so the church of Engaland doesn't speak for all christians.

But, like poititions he doesn't even speak for all cofe goers.... I wonder if he did it on his own back or with the permission of the queen?

[naomi24]

What's a cofe goer?