Donate SIGN UP

DNA in Transfused Blood

Avatar Image
Mortartube | 13:03 Wed 30th Jan 2008 | Science
3 Answers
Hello, I have been pondering this.

Imagine that as a blood donor, I gave blood and that blood was given to a patient in hospital as a transfusion. Then imagine a short while later that the patient becomes well and goes out and commits a crime where some of their blood is spilt, (i.e they cut themselves).

Would my DNA possibly be at the crime scene and potentially lead to my arrest even if I wasn't there?

Or would my DNA be in such small amounts compared to the recipient that there could be no doubt that it wasn't me who committed the crime?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Mortartube. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Red blood cells don't have nucleii, so no DNA and therefore the majority of transfusions (using packed red blood cells) wouldn't make very much of a difference. Whole blood transfusions might show up but not for long. Any nucleated cells would be seen as foreign by the recipient's immune system and destroyed over a fairly short time scale. Bone marrow transplants might be a problem, however, particularly due to the fact that immature red blood cells, often released into the bloodstream when the body is low on oxygen carrying capacity, do have nucleii.
Question Author
Thank you for that. I have been wondering for a while, but only just got around to posting the question.
What a great question!

(and answer by dundurn)

1 to 3 of 3rss feed

Do you know the answer?

DNA in Transfused Blood

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.