Donate SIGN UP

Fishing vrs Cruelty

Avatar Image
Bewlay Bros | 16:12 Tue 06th Nov 2007 | ChatterBank
8 Answers
Is fishing for pleasure as opposed to for food cruel?

I am sure the little fish doesn't much enjoy having a hook spear through its lips, dragged through the water at a rate of knots and being kept in a net for a few hours.

However, it is hard to become too sentimentally attached to a cold blooded scaley creature.

Any opinions?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by Bewlay Bros. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Until someone can covince me that fish can't feel pain then yes I'll always think it's a cruel, not to mention, pointless sport.
I think it's very cruel
Hey Boo we both had the same idea at the same tme.
I thinks its just a bit sad to get up at 5am, leave a warm woman and bed, to go and sit on a riverbank with a load of other blokes with mullets and nicotine stained fingers...
as a sport where they throw them back in yer its cruel, if they eat them after its fine. That is after all what man used to do to stay alive
Worse still is when your man leaves you early in the morning, comes back and dumps his maggots in the fridge! S*d the fish!
Unless the fish are to be eaten, it's a vile "sport".
I dont get the sport part of it, you sit on a muddy river bank all day waiting for a tiny fish to get caught, where is the skill??

not to mention how cruel it is to the fish

1 to 8 of 8rss feed

Do you know the answer?

Fishing vrs Cruelty

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.