A victory for common sense

[flip_flop]

Agree?

What I'd like to know is on what grounds this woman felt she was entitled to more of her ex-husband's money, particularly as they were divorced 30 years ago as a result of her infidelity.

[WaldoMcFroog]

Might agree if I knew what you were talking about...

[Gromit]

Is it Elsie Tanner?

[flip_flop]

Oops, sorry.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles /news/news.html?in_article_id=470774&in_page_i d=1770&ICO=NEWS&ICL=TOPART

[Reverandfunk]

Agree, hope she got fined for wasting the courts time.

[WaldoMcFroog]

Seems rather a farsical claim to me, and I'm glad they've told her to s0d off.

[libertie]

What a greedy, cheeky mare and how ridiculous that the court awarded her �2000.000 in the first place!

[Whickerman]

the law is a ass.

That that case got so far at all is crazy. That her solicitor was disappointed is madness.

[Lonnie]

The article I read on this, (may be in your link, I haven't looked), said that he was going to give her a small sum, out of court.

She gives women a bad name.

[bensmum]

I agree and it's good to see a common sense decision. As you say what made her feel she was entitled to more ?

[lovejoy]

You have to realise ladies and gentlemen that the lawmakers in this country have the most feeble minds in the history of mankind, and then you will understand why we have to tolerate a system that would be laughed off sesame street