News1 min ago
Really???
11 Answers
Is it true that they set up shilpa winning because they didn't want to be racist???
Answers
1 to 11 of 11
Best Answer
No best answer has yet been selected by Delish_Babi. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.
For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
I'm convinced it was a fix. I think chanel 4 were very clever in the editing and have made a fortune exploiting the three girls concerned.
Nobody is making any remarks about what Dirk said at the end of the show on Friday to Shilpa in the fact that the british are now a minority in their own country.
Nobody is making any remarks about what Dirk said at the end of the show on Friday to Shilpa in the fact that the british are now a minority in their own country.
Yes angelbabe, thanks for confirming, I thought I must have dreamnt it!
I remember watching BB late one night, I had had a few drinks, but Dirk was saying something like:
The average English family have 1.2 kids, 'they' have average 3.1 kids. Easy to work out that sooner or later, the English become the minority.
I went to bed thinking, he's probably right, but there will be one hell of a commotion in the media tomorrow.
But nothing! Free speech was allowed, it seems.
I remember watching BB late one night, I had had a few drinks, but Dirk was saying something like:
The average English family have 1.2 kids, 'they' have average 3.1 kids. Easy to work out that sooner or later, the English become the minority.
I went to bed thinking, he's probably right, but there will be one hell of a commotion in the media tomorrow.
But nothing! Free speech was allowed, it seems.
I cannot understand your reasoning NJOK.
Everone was betting on her to win. Which generally means a similar ratio was voting for her to win.
Surely, because we live in such a PC age, everyone knew she would win. But that does not mean everone voted for her to win, we will never know, we have only their word for it, so it could had been a set up.
William Hill and Ladbrokes obviously came to the same conclusion as the majority of us, when they set their odds.
Everone was betting on her to win. Which generally means a similar ratio was voting for her to win.
Surely, because we live in such a PC age, everyone knew she would win. But that does not mean everone voted for her to win, we will never know, we have only their word for it, so it could had been a set up.
William Hill and Ladbrokes obviously came to the same conclusion as the majority of us, when they set their odds.
1 to 11 of 11
