Who Gets Offended At A Bit Of Flesh

[nailit]

Would you even own up to been a bit of a prude if you did?
Pussycat Dolls (in Barsels thread), Page 3 (half) nude models, etc.
Why are some people so aghast at the human body?
I don't get it!
Just what *IS* offensive about human flesh?

[pixie374]

Yes, I'm sure, nailit, but it wouldn't have continued for so long if everyone had felt the same way as you.
I remember seeing a Page 3 model in my dad's paper when I was around 7 (my parents had just got divorced) and that was the very first time that I realised the job of women was to be sexy for men. I can actually remember it. I don't think that is great for young girls- or boys.

[pixie374]

In answer to your previous question, nailit- just context. That is the only difference x

[pastafreak]

Like pixie, I'd say context. I'd EXPECT the Pussycat Dolls to be dressed as they were, and I'd not see them performing that way to titillate.
I was extremely shocked when I first saw page 3...in my future FILs newspaper if I'm not mistaken. It felt and looked wrong, still does.

[Theland]

There's nothing sexier than a Northern lass in her clogs, mini skirts, boob tube, and the gravy from her tripe and onions running down her chin.

[-SharonA-]

Just watched this as the number of complaints has risen to over 650.
And I cannot for the life of me see what folks are moaning about.
I was expecting to see virtually naked girls!! Disappointed.