Donate SIGN UP

gta: liberty city

Avatar Image
milkybarkid | 16:54 Tue 25th Jul 2006 | Film, Media & TV
6 Answers
is it just me or was anyone else disappointed by grand theft auto: liberty city (for ps2)? it seems they got rid of a lot of cool stuff like swimming, eating, lots of the shops, property you can buy, bikes and stamina, muscle and other stuff like that. it means that you can't run very far or anything and i dont know why they would leave that out of it when they had it in san andreas. disappointing?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by milkybarkid. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
it came out years before gta san andreas and so consequently did not have many of the features of the later game. im not sure whether liberty city stories is the same though
yeah i KNOW. sucks :( but th music is ACES :D
yh i agree i had it on psp n it got soo ****** boring i gave it 2 my m8 :D
Question Author
goldenboy do you mean that liberty city stories came out before san andreas? i thought it just came out.
no gta3 set in libery city came out before gta vice city and gta san andreas respectively. then last out was liberty city stories for the psp then ps2. ive not seen lib cit stories so i dont know if its got the features of gta san andreas. all i know is that gta 3 was the first 3d gta game and didnt have properties to buy, bikes, getting fat etc.
but that was what was crap about san andreas having to build up your muscles and stuuff and san andreas is to gangstery wich i hate and too long wich is just boring so i have to say that liberty city is a better game

1 to 6 of 6rss feed

Do you know the answer?

gta: liberty city

Answer Question >>