Donate SIGN UP

MPs' Expenses Debate: 100? MPs Present.

Avatar Image
paraffin | 17:41 Tue 23rd Jun 2009 | News
5 Answers
Harriet Harman has just set out the criteria for future administration etc of MPs' Expenses in the House of Commons and it appears like there are no more than about 100 "Honourable Members" present.

Is the size of the turnout a true demonstration of their contrition for their recently exposed misdemeanours?

Or just another example of their arrogance towards the electorate?
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by paraffin. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
A lot of committees take place during the afternoon. Just because the chamber wa empty does not mean they are not interested.

The time to attend is when it is debated and voted on
I remember many many years ago on the Two Ronnies, they were doing their mock "news" at the end.

One of the news items was:

"In parliament today MPs voted on whether to make atttendance in parliament compulsery. The plan was defeated by 2 votes to 1".
vhg......lol
All these committees and sub-committees were meeting at the time you mention. Most parliamentary work is not done in the chamber.

1 Equality Bill Committee

2 Finance Bill Committee

3 Health Bill [Lords] Committee

4 First Delegated Legislation Committee

5 Second Delegated Legislation Committee

6 Third Delegated Legislation Committee

7 Fourth Delegated Legislation Committee

8 Fifth Delegated Legislation Committee

9 Sixth Delegated Legislation Committee

10 Welsh Affairs

11 Treasury

12 Regulatory Reform

13 Defence

14 Environmental Audit

15 International Development

16 Business and Enterprise

17 Home Affairs

18 Administration

19 Defence

20 Justice

21 Human Rights

http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200 809/cmagenda/ob90623.htm
Question Author
Gromit:

1 star for industry, but the fact is that given the national furore concerning their expenses scandal, still ongoing, they could have spared half and hour to hear what was to be implemented and, if necessary, had their say.

Too many chose not to and I'd take bets that hardly any were dealing with the matters you so diligently listed.

Their arrogance for the hand that feeds them remains undiluted.

1 to 5 of 5rss feed

Do you know the answer?

MPs' Expenses Debate: 100? MPs Present.

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.