Andy Murray

[thenry]

Pathetic !

[boxtops]

Because he's not a loser, thenry - he's done better than all the other entrants in the tournament, it's his first time in the finals, why be such a bitch about him? Could you do better? He fought a bloody good fight today, he has nothing to be ashamed of. You, on the other hand, are not making a good impression at all - I don't see anyone who agrees with your perspective.

[boxtops]

^^ and PS looking at all your other posts since you joined, you don't have a good word to say about anyone except your cider. I don't know why you bother.

[weecalf]

good luck to him seems a modest guy and a credit to the sport .did the bbbc win most experts at one venue for their coverage of wimbers .Never seen so many experts since seeing a taxi rank out side standstead airport

[rsvp]

sound of penny dropping - OP needs to get a life and stop saying that his opinion is the only one that counts.

[owdhamer]

He,s not that good

[thenry]

God Almighty ! The utter Britishism of losing ! Yeah. OK. The man did his best. He is still a goddam loser ! LOSER !

[gness]

I`m not British.

[petal54]

I was surprised how emotional Andy was ,7 he'll've gotten a nice wee pay cheque.He did better than any one I know!

[thenry]

I reckon so !

[Psybbo]

thenry, how have you lasted this long, oh I can't be bothered

[bazwillrun]

Murray is a very good tennis player, but thats as far as it goes.

The only thing that counts is winning, so losing whether it be a final or whatever is second best.

and as for "brave" whats that all about, he was doing his job and getting paid very well, is everybody that goes to work brave.

Form and class are described thus, form is temporary whereas class is permanent, Federer is class.

You will not see Murray at another Wimbledon final, most of the greats had already won it at least once by the age of 25.

Björn Borg won five of the six finals he reached.
Boris Becker won three of the seven finals he reached.
Pete Sampras won seven titles from 1993 to 1995 and 1997 to 2000.
Roger Federer won seven Wimbledon championships of the eight finals he reached.

say no more

[TWR]

Scotland Be proud, Britain has a fantastic player, the person does not need cider to show his class / talent, but some need a drink to state their views. ( Its a pity) I would give it up Thenry, your on a looser post here.

[mickrog]

bazwillrun.....spot on I totally agree with you.

[kenhawk]

You're the pathetic one

[anneasquith]

andy murray played great tennis, just not great enough to beat federer. i applaud the centre court and murray hill for the support they gave him, re the original OP. yes you are........pathetic :)

[mickrog]

it was a great Wimbledon anne....cant wait for Flushing Meadow.The OLYMPICS may favour Murray as the matches are only over 3 sets.

[LochNessMonster]

Fantastc player and the best Britain will produce for another 74 years. I have to take m tammie off the Rodger what skill he has. Even Novak struggled with him.

Andy : As Roger says your day will come dude !

[anneasquith]

MICK.......... we have the golf soon :)

[weecalf]

Tell you keep the beckhams away .won the colombo look a like

[sir.prize]

Well - after 100 posts we now know who is the REAL loser, don't we thenry?