Donate SIGN UP

Wonder What And Others Are Saying In Private To Benjamin

Avatar Image
bazwillrun | 16:02 Mon 25th Nov 2013 | News
27 Answers
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/nov/24/iran-nuclear-deal-obama-congress-israel


"Dont worry Benjy boy we know what the bast@#£s are up to, just go along with it 'cos it looks good in the press and will fool a lot of the lefties and do-gooders"

"Y'all dont go bombing them without letting us know "

surely nobody is fooled as to the real intentions of the iranians...nuclear weapons capability, nothing more nothing less, and can they really be so dumb and naive to think we are fooled...surely not - Hagues isnt that stupid is he...no thought not so this agreement is just a big publicity stunt...pheew thank god for that !

Even some of the locals dont want them to go nuclear as theyre schit scared of what Iran will do to them in their quest for mid east domination

Oh well its only a matter of time until these nuke facilities are ..lets say disabled..permanently !
Gravatar

Answers

1 to 20 of 27rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Best Answer

No best answer has yet been selected by bazwillrun. Once a best answer has been selected, it will be shown here.

For more on marking an answer as the "Best Answer", please visit our FAQ.
Question Author
haha left out Oblama blam a ding dong in the title !

yeah no need for an edit facility here
The concept of Mutually Assured Destruction, MAD for short, served the world well during the Cold War.
Pakistan has the bomb, Israel too. Why shouldn't Iran join the club?
I guess because every, untrusted to remain stable and sensible, country that gets this ability raises the risk more. The "superpowers" would have had enough sense to know not to use them as first strike, and to be very thoughtful about using them in retaliation also. I'm unsure the latest joiners or wannabe joiners to the club can boast the same credentials.
Question Author
@Sandy

Thanks but I know what MAD is

as has been said on numerous occasions, the others to my knowledge have never openly and publicy declared that they would use their nukes to wipe another country off the face of the planet.
The legitimacy of Israel is open to question, but that's a discussion for another day. Where and when did Iran state that they would use nuclear weapons to wipe it off the face of the planet?
-- answer removed --
wasn't it Ahmadinejad who said they would blow Israel off the face of the planet, or was that not true?
The ending of sanctions against Iran means that their oil can be traded again. With oil production from Iraq and Libya the US were more dependent than ever on Saudi production. The biggest losers from the deal are the Saudis. And apparently they are not happy at all. Oil prices fell yesterday on the news of the deal.

Obama has always been a bit off message about Israel. But now he is not seeking election again, he can quite happily ignore them, and the jewish lobby in the US are stymied. Israel will be feeling isolated now that its best mate and benefactor is doing deals with Iran. But that is when Israel is at its most dangerous. The US and Europe are billing the deal as a triumph, so the Israelis won't dare to attack Iran. But I would be at all surprised if they don't launch a major offensive against the Palestinians or Hezbollah in the next few months. That is what they normally do when they need a ego boost.
so it's all the Israelis fault, they are all egotists who can't abide America looking outside and seeing that deals with Iran might be a good thing if it reins them in from doing something suicidal for all concerned, wonder if that is really the case, as to them gearing up to drop bombs, rather jumping the gun aren't you, where is the evidence that is going to happen?
Correction, that should have been...

" With oil production from Iraq and Libya all but halted, the US were more dependent than ever on Saudi production.
as to Obama re-election that is still a way off, i am aware how long it takes for canvassing and once one election is won, then they start thinking, gearing up for the next, but 2012 he won his second term, so perhaps he is taking a little breather before going on the campaign trail
Question Author
"But I would be at all surprised if they don't launch a major offensive against the Palestinians or Hezbollah in the next few months. That is what they normally do when they need a ego boost. "

they dont need an ego boost, they do it to protect themselves

and as to launching an attack on iranian nuclear sites...they wouldnt hesitate

unlike us in the UK, their government really does put the security of its citizens first
Emmie,

Ahmadinejad of Iran actually said he wanted to erase the name of Israel from the map. He made no mention of an attack with nuclear weapons, which was just as well, because they don't have any. Erase them from the map has many interpretations. It was clearly a threat, but Israel threatens its neighbours all the time.
// as to Obama re-election that is still a way off //

That is my point. He is NOT seeking re-election, he is only allowed two terms and he is on his second. Which means the threat of losing the jewish vote at an election doesn't come into play.
// and as to launching an attack on iranian nuclear sites...they wouldnt hesitate //

Israel isn't really a sustainable state. Without the $3trillion given to it by the US, they would be as poverty stricken as the palestinians. I reckon they would think twice about pissing off the US if it meant they may longer get huge sums of cash to play with.
'Ahmadinejad of Iran actually said he wanted to erase the name of Israel from the map.'

So, Gromit, you interpret that to mean he is going to make a little alteration in Iran's map books. That sounds as delusional as the statements by that country's raving president.
Not so delusional playbill

There are many examples

for instance; we have erased the name East Germany (GDR) from the map

do you think nuclear weapons were involved there?
// So, Gromit, you interpret that to mean he is going to make a little alteration in Iran's map books. //

I said it has many interpretations. And it was spoken in Persia, and the translation into English brings in mistakes.

Ahmadinejad was quoting from an old speech by Ayotollah Khomeini from the 1980s in which he said in Persian “Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” This means, “This occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the arena of time.”

It was the New York Times who first mistranslated "vanish from the arena of time" to 'wiped off the map'. `In short, the widely reported quote is wrong and he probably did not mean a Nuclear attack.
probably, but not without some degree of maybe.
as to Obama, he could run again, wasn't it FDR who held office three terms.
East Germany simply re-merged into what it was before the second world war: the eastern half of the German state. And this was with the blessing and willingness of most of the people on both sides.

What are you saying - that Iran only wants to peacefully merge Israel into a greater Iran? Think you'll find slight difference of cultures, democracy and sanity between theses two.

Also, a merger might not go down so well with other countries situated between the two.

1 to 20 of 27rss feed

1 2 Next Last

Do you know the answer?

Wonder What And Others Are Saying In Private To Benjamin

Answer Question >>

Related Questions

Sorry, we can't find any related questions. Try using the search bar at the top of the page to search for some keywords, or choose a topic and submit your own question.