Paul was the founder of the Christian church and I've already talked about his instruction that women must not teach, they must not have authority over men, and they must remain silent. I think that's plain enough.
Apart from that, as far as I am aware, the Bible does not specifically say that women must be excluded from the priesthood, but that's because when the books were written, there was no reason to state the obvious. The bible says that women are inferior to men, and that they must obey men - they weren't even important enough to be counted in the census - so the question of them entering the priesthood would never have arisen. It would have been unthinkable. What you have to remember is that in the Middle East in ancient times it was normal for women to be considered inferior - and it's still normal in many areas of the Middle East today.
However, moving back to Flobadob and Ratter's point, which is a point of principle, if Christians believe the bible is the word of God, and they believe God doesn't make mistakes, then it follows that if they choose to accept women into the priesthood, they are contravening God's laws.
jno, what a ridiculous thing to say. We are discussing a point of principle - something that happens in many good debates - but since the subject matter and many of the comments aren't to your liking, rather than join the discussion you simply attempt to stifle the debate for others - as usual. And, yes, I do take the subject of religion seriously.