Global Warming Is A Scam.

[Theland]

Investigate the evidence it is a scam.

[naomi24]

Do you have something to say, Theland?

[Theland]

Naomi - You are nobody's fool. I respect your intellect.
Check out the video.

[naomi24]

Theland, no. I'm not here to watch videos. If you have something to say, have the courtesy to say it.

[Baldric]

It's your post, you "investigate the facts"

[Theland]

Courtesy - Too much to say in a post. Far too much.

[naomi24]

But you expect other people to post on the content of it ....

[Spicerack]

It's alright. They've got a new plan to end Global Warming. Cannibalism.

[Baldric]

Man up Theland, manage your own posts, don't expect us to do it for you!

[AZardoz]

Lots of experts on YouTube making perpetual motion machines.
Those could really help - free energy.

Have you tired of the religious rants?

[Theland]

Not at all. I am only making a statement, not trying to convince anybody. The truth will out.
Retiring from this now. Enjoy.

[naomi24]

Well ... that made sense. :o/

[Mozz71]

So I'm guessing Theland needed some attention.

[douglas9401]

And tonight Theland is........................................Father Jack!

[10ClarionSt]

I thought the term "Global warming" had been dropped by most campaigners in favour of "Climate Change"?
Anyway, Theland is correct. It's a scam. To make loads of dosh out of us, the great unwashed. It's a power grab thing to influence the worlds' industrial and financial markets in favour of a small minority, led by Al Gore.

[Old_Geezer]

And our next rational discussion will be please pick from the list
https://www.conspiracies.net/conspiracy-theories-list-index/

[mibn2cweus]

No worries Theland. It's September. The Global Cooling conspiracies should be kickin' in any day now.

[benhilton]

Theland , I agree with you .
Here's a short 15m clip .
I take the word of this genuine expert higher than the word of anyone on here .

[Old_Geezer]

It'd be more interesting to see a debate between two "authorities" with divergent views than see someone built up and then asked for their interpretation. Been plenty of times in the past when pet "experts" have spoken out in opposition with the mainstream wisdom and later proved to be in error. Giving one person a soapbox and not probing deeply with difficult questions is not overly informative.

[Old_Geezer]

https://skepticalscience.com/patrick-michaels-history-getting-climate-wrong.html ?

[jim360]

Maybe pick an expert who *isn't* funded by oil companies though.

The scientific consensus is clear. Picking one "expert" is a dangerous tactic if you want to understand the scientific picture.