It strikes me that the religious are self-obsessed, dependent and afraid, but the vast majority never really think about it so don't consider their belief in something for which there is no evidence, to be in any way unusual. In fact they feel perfectly entitled to take offence at the very suggestion that there is no evidence for the existence of their God - even though there isn't - and society supports them! What a ridiculously cockeyed situation!
jno, //Among possible conclusions: ah, they're only happy because they're stupid; if only they knew the truth...
or: if believers outnumber non-believers by five to one (that seems to be about the ratio), surely it's the latter who must be considered unbalanced?//
That's incredibly wonky logic. Unlike the religious, no rational atheist claims to 'know the truth'. To imply that someone who doesn't believe in something for which there is no evidence is unbalanced, and that because the majority believe in it, it must be true, is ... well .... unbalanced.
steg, no, not like atheists at all. As I said, unlike the religious, no intelligent atheist claims to know the truth. Given the proof, a rational atheist would become a believer.
Zeuhl, //Yeah but he was nuts!// Haaaaa! Love it!